2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-16934-2_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Merging Business Process Models

Abstract: Abstract-This paper studies the following problem: given a pair of business process models, determine which elements in one model are related to which elements in the other model. This problem arises in the context of merging different versions or variants of a business process model or when comparing business process models in order to display their similarities and differences. The paper investigates two approaches to this alignment problem: one based purely on lexical matching of pairs of elements and anoth… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
62
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
62
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…CBP models are typically created by hand (1) from scratch, (2) from an existing BP model by including possible adaptations [8], or (3) by merging some BP models related to the same or similar goals which already exist [15]. In the latter case, there exist approaches focused on automatically merging different BP models into a CBP model [14,15].…”
Section: Configurable Bp Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CBP models are typically created by hand (1) from scratch, (2) from an existing BP model by including possible adaptations [8], or (3) by merging some BP models related to the same or similar goals which already exist [15]. In the latter case, there exist approaches focused on automatically merging different BP models into a CBP model [14,15].…”
Section: Configurable Bp Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To analyze the behavior of the method against different complexities, the 259 configurable nodes were grouped considering OB. In particular 4 groups were considered: OB ∈ [2, 5), OB ∈ [5,8), OB ∈ [8,11) and OB ∈ [11,14) (cf. Table.…”
Section: Case Study and Data Collection Procedurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such languages include Configurable EPCs [74,31], aggregated EPCs [62], and the variant rich process models [76], which pick up ideas and concepts from modeling of software product families and feature diagrams [26,94]. The definition of generic process models relates to identifying similar process models with overlapping behaviour [89,14,12,99] and integrating them into a single model [57,45,21,70].This integration is a particular instance of RF8, which aims to remove redundancies.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our work instead provides a precise definition of how to determine the behavioural intersection of two process models. There is also work that aims to determine the union of the behaviour captured by two process models [10,11,12,13]. None of these works has been integrated and extended towards the definition of an algebra.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Throughout this paper, we will demonstrate that the essential variant management questions can be answered based on set algebraic operations of complementation, intersection, and union, and the relations of set equivalence and inclusion. Although there are several works on particular subsets of these aspects such as inclusion (or behaviour inheritance) [7,8,9] and union (or merging behaviour) [10,11,12,13], we currently miss an overarching set algebra which provides the means to efficiently calculate with behaviour.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%