2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-10871-6_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Merging and Ranking Answers in the Semantic Web: The Wisdom of Crowds

Abstract: Abstract. In this paper we propose algorithms for combining and ranking answers from distributed heterogeneous data sources in the context of a multi-ontology Question Answering task. Our proposal includes a merging algorithm that aggregates, combines and filters ontology-based search results and three different ranking algorithms that sort the final answers according to different criteria such as popularity, confidence and semantic interpretation of results. An experimental evaluation on a large scale corpus … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In case of the system failing to automatically interpret the question, it can prompt the user with the dialog as is the case with FREyA. The fine balance is in the combination of these approaches: disambiguate as much as possible and use the ranking mechanisms (e.g., those that exist in FREyA, or any other methods for effective ranking such as [13]), and correct them if necessary using the interactive features of FREyA.…”
Section: Querying Linked Data With Freyamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In case of the system failing to automatically interpret the question, it can prompt the user with the dialog as is the case with FREyA. The fine balance is in the combination of these approaches: disambiguate as much as possible and use the ranking mechanisms (e.g., those that exist in FREyA, or any other methods for effective ranking such as [13]), and correct them if necessary using the interactive features of FREyA.…”
Section: Querying Linked Data With Freyamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gingseng does not provide full natural language interface, but rather guides user input with respect to the considered ontologies, suggesting term and relations present in the underlying ontologies. PowerAqua [12] implements a strategy for (i) combining and (ii) ranking answers from distributed heterogeneous data sources in the context of a multi-ontology Question Answering task. The result list integrates triples coming from different data stores, ranked using a multi-level ranking algorithm, which combines three different criteria (popularity, confidence and semantic interpretation).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More advanced approaches therefore enrich their query with semantically similar words. For example, by looking up synonyms in a dictionary, often WordNet ( [18], [17], [12]), but dictionaries in general contain a very limited vocabulary and even WordNet has very few named entities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lopez et al [11] and later by Damljanovic et al [4], who extend work from [18] by allowing user feedback, query refinement, and query expansion. In contrast to the most of other systems, PowerAqua [10] (building on [11]) is able to work with multiple heterogeneous ontologies. It transforms the input keyword query into the intermediate triple form, similarly to the principle of other approaches, the intermediate format is than mapped to the candidate entities in distinct ontologies.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%