Merger profitability in mixed oligopoly

Méndez-Naya, José

doi:10.1007/s00712-008-0001-7

Cited by 29 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Mendez-Naya has also published three articles [32][33][34]. The topics are mainly the sustainability of M&A processes under the effect of factors such as the asymmetry of information or partner nationality.…”

Section: Measures Of Productivitymentioning

confidence: 99%

A Systematic Review of Research on Sustainability in Mergers and Acquisitions

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The field of mergers and acquisitions and sustainability has been expanding in the last years; consequently, there is a need for a systematic review of the existing body of knowledge. This article aims to fill this gap by providing an overview and synthesis of the research topic. The specific objectives are (1) to assess the academic impact, and (2) to determine the structure of the topic. To achieve these goals, a bibliometric analysis will be carried out through a selection of articles taken from the WoS database from 1900 to 2019. First, the historical evolution of publications will be addressed, the distribution of articles by journal and by individual author, as well as the total number of citations per article. Second, this article will develop networks of co-citations of authors and journals and co-word analysis by using VOS Viewer software. The global results will provide insights into the nature and trends of research on mergers and acquisitions and sustainability.

show abstract

Section: Measures Of Productivitymentioning

confidence: 99%

A Systematic Review of Research on Sustainability in Mergers and Acquisitions

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…That paper has been extended to analyze factors that affect partial privatization of public firms. Among other factors, the literature has considered partially foreign-owned private firms (Han and Ogawa, 2008), foreign investment in partially privatized firms (Lin and Matsumura, 2012), cross-ownership of firms (Jain and Pal, 2012;Chai and Karasawa-Ohtashiro, 2015), trade policies (Chao and Yu, 2006;Long and St€ ahler, 2009), product differentiation (Fujiwara, 2007;Lu and Poddar, 2007), free entry (Matsumura and Kanda, 2005;Wang and Chen, 2010), endogenous timing of decisions (B arcena-Ruiz and Garz on, 2010), environmental problems (Kato, 2006;Ohori, 2006) and merger problems (B arcena-Ruiz and Garz on, 2003;M endez-Naya, 2008). However, this literature has not considered partial privatization of state corporations that produce more than one type of goods at more than one production plant.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Partial Privatization of State Holding Corporations

Dong

Bárcena‐Ruiz

Garzón

2017

The Manchester School

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We consider a state holding corporation with two plants that may produce complementary or substitute goods and that competes with one or two private firms. We find that the government partially privatizes the two plants of the state holding corporation and is indifferent between selling them partially to a single investor and to different investors. However, in the former case the government retains a greater (smaller) stake in the state corporation if goods are substitutes (complements).

show abstract

“…Corneo and Jeanne [9], Fjell and Pal [10], Pal and White [11], and Matsushima and Matsumura [12] investigated the international mixed oligopolistic competition. Bárcena-Ruiz and Garzón [13] and Méndez-Naya [14] discussed a merger problem between the public firm and the private firm. Ohori [15], Bárcena-Ruiz and Garzón [16], Wang et al [17], and Chen and Wang [18] analyzed the environmental policies in the mixed oligopoly.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Capacity Choice in a Price-Setting Mixed Duopoly with Network Effects

Nakamura¹

2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper explores the capacity choice for a public firm that is a welfare-maximizer and for a private firm that is a pure-profit-maximizer in the context of a price-setting mixed duopoly with a simple mechanism of network effects where the surplus that a firm's client gets increases with the number of other clients of that firm. In this paper, we show that the public firm chooses over-capacity irrespective of the strength of network effects and the demand parameter, and that the difference between the output level and capacity level of the private firm strictly depends on the values of both the strength of network effects and the demand parameter. More precisely, the private firm chooses over-capacity when the strength of network effects is high relative to the demand parameter, while it chooses under-capacity otherwise.

show abstract

Merger profitability in mixed oligopoly

Abstract: Mixed oligopoly, Privatization, Merger, L00, L13, L33,

Cited by 29 publications

References 12 publications

A Systematic Review of Research on Sustainability in Mergers and Acquisitions

A Systematic Review of Research on Sustainability in Mergers and Acquisitions

Partial Privatization of State Holding Corporations

Capacity Choice in a Price-Setting Mixed Duopoly with Network Effects

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About