2008
DOI: 10.1145/1371579.1371581
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mercury BLASTP

Abstract: Large-scale protein sequence comparison is an important but compute-intensive task in molecular biology. BLASTP is the most popular tool for comparative analysis of protein sequences. In recent years, an exponential increase in the size of protein sequence databases has required either exponentially more running time or a cluster of machines to keep pace. To address this problem, we have designed and built a high-performance FPGA-accelerated version of BLASTP, Mercury BLASTP. In this paper, we describe the arc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sequences of putative aldehyde dehydrogenases were retrieved from a BLASTp [ 62 ] search using Homo sapiens ALDH proteins as query against the genomes of the selected Opisthokont and Trypanosomatida species (BLOSUM62, Existence: 11 Extension: 1 Conditional compositional score matrix adjustment). The subsequent hits were analysed and outliers excluded from the phylogenetic assembly based on protein alignment generated using EMB-EBI Clustal Omega.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sequences of putative aldehyde dehydrogenases were retrieved from a BLASTp [ 62 ] search using Homo sapiens ALDH proteins as query against the genomes of the selected Opisthokont and Trypanosomatida species (BLOSUM62, Existence: 11 Extension: 1 Conditional compositional score matrix adjustment). The subsequent hits were analysed and outliers excluded from the phylogenetic assembly based on protein alignment generated using EMB-EBI Clustal Omega.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, all of the known Arabidopsis PAT gene sequences were used as query sequences to perform multiple database searches against proteome and genome files downloaded from the Phytozome database (www.phytozome.net/) [31] and PlantGDB database (www.plantgdb.org/) [32]. Stand-alone versions of BLASTP [33] and TBLASTN (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov), which are available from NCBI, were used with an e-value cut-off of 1e-003 [34]. All protein sequences derived from the collected candidate PAT genes were examined using the domain analysis programs PFAM (http://pfam.sanger.ac.uk/) and SMART (http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de/) with the default cut-off parameters.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The genome structure was annotated using Glimmer version 3.02 (10). To obtain the protein function annotation, the predicted protein sequences were compared with those in the nonredundant protein (NR), Cluster of Orthologous Groups (COG), KEGG, Gene Ontology (GO), and Swiss-Prot databases in NCBI using BLASTP with an E value of 1e−5 (11).…”
Section: Announcementmentioning
confidence: 99%