Mental health status among family members of health care workers in Ningbo, China, during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak: a cross-sectional study

Abstract

Background To date, the psychological impact of COVID-19 epidemic among family members of health care workers (HCWs) in China has been neglected. This cross-sectional study investigates the mental health status and related factors in families of HCWs employed in designated hospitals in Ningbo, China. Methods Family members of HCWs in five designated hospitals in Ningbo, China, were recruited in February, 2020 for this study. Demographic variables, COVID-19-related events in the lives of the participants, knowledge of COVID-19, and the working status of family members (that is, HCWs) were collected using online self-administered questionnaires. Mental health status was assessed using the Chinese versions of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the main factors associated with the mental health conditions. Results In total, 845 participants completed the questionnaires correctly (95.80% response rate). The prevalence of anxiety and depression symptoms were respectively 33.73% (95% CI: 30.53–36.92%) and 29.35% (95% CI: 26.27–32.43%) when a cut-off score of 5 was used for GAD-7 and PHQ-9. Risk factors for anxiety symptoms included more time (hours) spent thinking about the COVID-19, and whether or not family members (that is, HCWs) had direct contact with confirmed or suspected COVID-19 patients while high participants’ self-reported safety scores for HCW’s protective equipment was a protective factor. More time (hours) spent thinking about COVID-19, longer average working time per week worked by family members (that is, HCWs), and being parents and other next of kin of HCWs were risk factors for depressive symptoms. Compared to participants who were HCWs, participants who were private sector workers were more likely to develop depressive symptoms, while government or institutional employees were less likely to suffer from depressive symptoms. Conclusions Psychological responses to COVID-19 have been dramatic among family members of HCWs during the rising phase of the outbreak. Our findings provide strong evidence to examine and attend to the mental health of this population during the COVID-19 epidemic.

Prevalence of Anxiety and Depression in General Population of Iran during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Web-Based Cross-Sectional Study

“…The unemployed working-age responders had strikingly poorer mental health (i.e., higher anxiety and depression symptoms) compared to the employed participants. These ndings are consistent with the studies from the general population in which anxiety and depression disorders are more common in unemployed people than in employed people (24,25). Furthermore, compared to the employed participants, students had higher depression symptoms, and housewife women had higher anxiety symptoms.…”

Psychological Distress After Covid-19 Recovery: Reciprocal Effects With Temperament and Emotional Dysregulation. An Exploratory Study of Patients Over 60 Years of Age Assessed in a Post-acute Care Service

“…The Covid-19 outbreak and the subsequent lockdown have caused significant distress in the general population in many countries and resulted in various psychological problems in the caregivers (1), healthcare workers (2), and the patients themselves (3)(4)(5). Lockdown-related loneliness and isolation may play a part in this distress (6).…”

A Second Pandemic: Mental Health Spillover From the Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19)

“…Evidence suggests that survivors of ICU treatment are at elevated risk for posttraumatic stress disorder, depression, sleep disturbance, poor quality of life, and cognitive dysfunction (Righy et al, 2019; Wang et al, 2019). Family members may experience distress, fear, or anxiety about the hospitalization of a loved one, particularly when infection control measures restrict visitation (Ying et al, 2020). The traumatic and stressful aspects of involvement in a pandemic also risks psychological harm to clinicians (Kang et al, 2020; Lima et al, 2020).…”