1986
DOI: 10.1016/0167-4870(86)90024-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mental economics: Subjective representations of factors related to expected inflation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, in an earlier study, Svenson and Nilsson (1986) compared psychology students' mental models of inflation with those of economics students. They developed a method to elicit variables perceived as related to inflation and judgements of the perceived strength of the relationships between them.…”
Section: Individuals' Conceptualisations Of Inflation and The Economymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Finally, in an earlier study, Svenson and Nilsson (1986) compared psychology students' mental models of inflation with those of economics students. They developed a method to elicit variables perceived as related to inflation and judgements of the perceived strength of the relationships between them.…”
Section: Individuals' Conceptualisations Of Inflation and The Economymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…As a notable example, questions about inflation expectations can ask about 'prices in general' or 'inflation' (Bruine de Bruin et al, 2012). Although the 'inflation' wording may seem more difficult (Bruine de Bruin et al, 2012), people tend to be familiar with the term (Leiser & Drori, 2005;Svenson & Nilsson, 1986;Williamson & Wearing, 1996).…”
Section: Effects Of Question Wording: 'Prices In General' Vs 'Inflatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, others recognized the question about "prices in general" as asking about the U.S. inflation rate. Indeed, studies have found that members of the general public are familiar with the term "inflation" and have a basic understanding of what it means (Leiser & Drori, 2005;Svenson & Nilsson, 1986;Williamson & Wearing, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%