1977
DOI: 10.2307/1128899
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mental Development of Preterm Infants during the First Year

Abstract: Developmental rates and standard scores are examined for 56 infants in 4 gestational age groups by repeated measurements on the mental scale of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development. Rates across the first year of life can be predicted largely by a biological model that assumes equality of development for infants of the same conceptual age. However, standard scores based on biological age are elevated during the early months for the most premature groups, indicating a transient advantage of increased extraut… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Not only have the studies 1 2 , 1 9 -2 1 d i ff e red as to when o v e restimation has occurred, but they have also reached conflicting conclusions re g a rding the choice of whether or not to use both ages. Whereas some studies 12,20 suggested using only corrected age, as it can be a more sensitive index of developmental delay, o t h e r s 1 9 , 2 1 s u p p o rted using both ages during the first y e a r. The decrease in the sensitivity in the assessment tool when using corrected age, and the advantages of increasing sensitivity to correctly identify the neurological abnormal pre t e rm infants were the most often cited arguments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not only have the studies 1 2 , 1 9 -2 1 d i ff e red as to when o v e restimation has occurred, but they have also reached conflicting conclusions re g a rding the choice of whether or not to use both ages. Whereas some studies 12,20 suggested using only corrected age, as it can be a more sensitive index of developmental delay, o t h e r s 1 9 , 2 1 s u p p o rted using both ages during the first y e a r. The decrease in the sensitivity in the assessment tool when using corrected age, and the advantages of increasing sensitivity to correctly identify the neurological abnormal pre t e rm infants were the most often cited arguments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies in the 70's focused on the premature infant's biological status and medical complications to predict developmental outcome (Pape, Buncic, Ashby, & Fitzhardinge, 1978;Hunt & Rhodes, 1977;Lubchenco, Delivoria-Papadopoulos, & Searls, 1972). More recent studies show that a biopsychosocial perspective incorporating both biologic and social risk should be used to evaluate the developmental outcome of the premature infant (Mccain, 1990;Lancaster, 1986).…”
Section: Premature Infant Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In studies of cognitive, sensori-motor, and socio-emotional development during the first year of life, premature infants generally demonstrate delays and differences when compared to matched full-term infants, but the differences are subtle and inconsistent (27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32). A general pattern seems to be that the premature infant's course of early development is difficult to predict.…”
Section: T F Anders and M Keenermentioning
confidence: 99%