2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2012.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mental contamination: The effects of imagined physical dirt and immoral behaviour

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(26 reference statements)
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the vast majority of individuals with a history of sexual trauma report experiencing at least transient mental contamination at some point following their assault (Fairbrother & Rachman, 2004), much of the research on mental contamination has been conducted among these samples. Related laboratory paradigms have been developed to serve as analogues for investigation of relevant processes involved in traumatic sexual victimization (Elliott & Radomsky, 2009; Herba & Rachman, 2007; Radomsky & Elliott, 2009, 2012). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As the vast majority of individuals with a history of sexual trauma report experiencing at least transient mental contamination at some point following their assault (Fairbrother & Rachman, 2004), much of the research on mental contamination has been conducted among these samples. Related laboratory paradigms have been developed to serve as analogues for investigation of relevant processes involved in traumatic sexual victimization (Elliott & Radomsky, 2009; Herba & Rachman, 2007; Radomsky & Elliott, 2009, 2012). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, studies involving imagery of a past instance of sexual victimization as well as analogue studies involving imagery of a nonconsensual kiss at a party (i.e., dirty kiss paradigm ) suggest cognitive appraisals such as beliefs about the degree of violation associated with an event, perceived responsibility for the event, and perceptions of the perpetrator (e.g., morality/immorality of character, physical cleanliness) may be involved in the development of mental contamination concerns (Elliott & Radomsky, 2009; Ishikawa et al, in press; Radomsky & Elliott, 2009, 2012). Preliminary evidence further suggests that posttraumatic cognitions, including those related to self-blame, negative beliefs about the self, and negative beliefs about the world, mediate the association between mental contamination and posttraumatic stress symptoms following traumatic sexual victimization (Olatunji et al, 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 60 contamination-relevant pictures (e.g., a dirty toilet) were selected from the IAPS, the by a physically dirty man. For the neutral induction the audio script of the consensual physically clean condition of Elliott and Radomsky (2012) was adjusted by substituting the consensual kiss on the mouth by a kiss on the cheek as a means of saying goodbye. A kiss on the cheek is a common informal way of saying goodbye to friends in Belgium.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fairbrother et al (8) triggered mental contamination in female university students by making them listen to a voice record about a nonconsensual kissing case. Consequently, different variables such as attractiveness (9), immoral behavior (10), physical dirtiness (11), and betrayal were added on these scenarios, and the factors affecting mental contamination were investigated. Radomsky and Elliott (13) performed a study in which they let participants listen conditions by manipulating responsibility (the condition that participant did not give consent to be kissed), personal violation (the condition that the participants were kissed by force) and morality (the condition that the kisser was an immoral individual) components into different scenarios, so as to determine their effects on mental contamination.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consistent with expectations, kissing scenarios triggered mental contamination in participants and caused negative feelings. Elliott and Radomsky (11) investigated associations of mental contamination feelings when non-consensual kissing condition was performed by a physically dirty person. According to obtained results, it was shown that non-consensual kissing by a physically dirty person caused higher mental contamination than the condition that the kissing person was clean, and also the condition of consensual kissing by a dirty/clean person.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%