2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.srhc.2015.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Menstrual hygiene practices and its association with reproductive tract infections and abnormal vaginal discharge among women in India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

9
99
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
9
99
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Anand et al highlighted how the married women in their study were bound by cost constraints and were veiled by social pressures and taboos. 14 Thakur et al and Garg et al had similar reasons quoted in their studies respectively. 15,5…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Anand et al highlighted how the married women in their study were bound by cost constraints and were veiled by social pressures and taboos. 14 Thakur et al and Garg et al had similar reasons quoted in their studies respectively. 15,5…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Anand et al reported similar associations in their study among married women in India which explored the determinants of menstrual hygienic practices and its effect on reproductive tract infections (RTI). 14 As regards to the reason for not using sanitary napkins, nearly 50% found it to be too costly, followed by 30% who found it less accessible and about 3% who were bound by societal pressures or were used to the traditional method of using cloth. Anand et al highlighted how the married women in their study were bound by cost constraints and were veiled by social pressures and taboos.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 Anand E et al state that various studies show that both Reproductive tract infections (RTI) and Vaginal discharge are related with non-use of hygienic methods during menstruation. 6 According to the National Family Health Survey (NFHS) 4 (2015 -16), only 57.6% of women (Urban 77.5, Rural 48.2) in the age group of 15 to 24 years use hygienic methods of protection during their menstrual period. Sanitary napkins, tampons and locally prepared napkins are considered as hygienic methods of protection.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Menstrual hygiene management (MHM) is becoming an important sub-area of focus for water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) researchers [1], where many small-scale projects point to lack of access to adequate information, products, and disposal systems within many low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) [2]. Existing evidence shows that ignoring the impacts of MHM can be quite detrimental to the overall growth and success of women, with inadequate menstrual hygiene linked to reproductive tract infections [3,4], school attendance/dropping out [5][6][7][8][9][10], and impacts on overall psychosocial well-being [11][12][13][14]. The lack of proper facilities and education in many countries demonstrates the necessity for policies improving the quality and availability of sanitation and hygiene options [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%