2014
DOI: 10.17772/gp/1879
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Menopausal status strongly influences the utility of predictive models in differential diagnosis of ovarian tumors: An external validation of selected diagnostic tools

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other reports revealed the age group above the 65 years, constitutes 30-40 % of all ovarian cancer patients (22,54). This higher prevalence of age linked ovarian malignancy may related to menopausal period (14) and advance age (50).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other reports revealed the age group above the 65 years, constitutes 30-40 % of all ovarian cancer patients (22,54). This higher prevalence of age linked ovarian malignancy may related to menopausal period (14) and advance age (50).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The lifetime risk of developing ovarian cancer in general population is 1.4 per cent and the mean age of presentation is 64 years, even though its incidence are varied by regions (7). Many factors play major role in the disease development and these includes advance age (8,9), genetics associations (10)(11)(12), early menstruation (13), late menopause (14) and hormonal therapy (15). An ovarian tumors are mainly primary but secondaries from colon (16), stomach (17), small intestine (18), pancreas (6), breast (19) and even thyroid cancer (20) are also common.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All patients had no missing values in the attributes required by the diagnostic scales. The dataset is described in detail in [10].…”
Section: Evaluation and Results Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They vary from basic scoring systems [6] , through rule-based schemes [7] to machine learning techniques [8]. Both the sensitivity and specificity of some models exceeds 90% in external evaluation [9,10].…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, we consider that when the predictive models are assessed, it seems reasonable to provide data about the level of diagnostic confidence in SA for the tumors included. In general, other studies on the efficacy of prognostic models provided detailed characteristics of US features and the clinical data on the women in the studies . Data about relative confidence levels of the SA would provide information about the clinical difficulties encountered in the diagnosis of the tumors included in the studies, thereby providing essential information about the conditions under which the predictive model was validated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%