2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2006.03.163
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Memstill membrane distillation – a future desalination technology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In MD process, a porous non-selective hydrophobic membrane acts as a physical support separating a warm solution from a cooler chamber containing either a liquid or gas [2]. Compared with conventional separation processes such as evaporation, distillation and reverse osmosis, MD can be operated under relatively low temperature or low pressure with low energy consumption and high productivity [3][4][5]. There have been extensive researches on MD for the past three decades [2] and various configurations have been developed including direct contact membrane distillation (DCMD), air gap membrane distillation (AGMD), sweeping gas membrane distillation (SGMD) and vacuum membrane distillation (VMD) [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In MD process, a porous non-selective hydrophobic membrane acts as a physical support separating a warm solution from a cooler chamber containing either a liquid or gas [2]. Compared with conventional separation processes such as evaporation, distillation and reverse osmosis, MD can be operated under relatively low temperature or low pressure with low energy consumption and high productivity [3][4][5]. There have been extensive researches on MD for the past three decades [2] and various configurations have been developed including direct contact membrane distillation (DCMD), air gap membrane distillation (AGMD), sweeping gas membrane distillation (SGMD) and vacuum membrane distillation (VMD) [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Memstill project presented in 2006 by Hanemaijer et al [13] claims to have the potential to reduce the cost of existing desalination technologies for seawater and brackish water, by replacing MSF and MED modules by an air gap MD module. The process proposes to reduce the desalination costs to $0.26 /m 3 using low grade thermal steam or heat as the driving force.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the IMS have several drawbacks that have been difficult to overcome, such as the water recovery rates are usually lower than 70%, for a price often considered as uneconomic due to capital and energy costs, and have complicated pre-treatment and post-treatment, high operation and maintenance requirements. Furthermore, unlike thermal processes, RO membranes do not provide high purity water [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%