2008 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics 2008
DOI: 10.1109/aim.2008.4601762
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MEMS Capacitive Force Sensor for Use in Microassembly

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several innovations have been made in recent years to facilitate haptic feedback in micromanipulation, including piezoresistive strain gauges [9]- [12] and optical Fiber Bragg Grating (FBG) sensors [13] for tool-tip force measurement in microsurgery devices, piezoelectric polyvinylidine-floride (PVDF) films [14] and MEMS-based capacitive sensor arrays [15], [16] for tactile sensing in robotic micromanipulation, and monolithic MEMS-based force-sensing manipulators [17], [18]. All of these innovations enable precise force measurement or contact localization suitable for micromanipulation, but several of them also entail problems with fabrication cost, mechanical robustness, signal fidelity and temporal hysteresis, packaging and assembly limitations, and a lack of functional versatility that make them unfit for general-purpose micromanipulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several innovations have been made in recent years to facilitate haptic feedback in micromanipulation, including piezoresistive strain gauges [9]- [12] and optical Fiber Bragg Grating (FBG) sensors [13] for tool-tip force measurement in microsurgery devices, piezoelectric polyvinylidine-floride (PVDF) films [14] and MEMS-based capacitive sensor arrays [15], [16] for tactile sensing in robotic micromanipulation, and monolithic MEMS-based force-sensing manipulators [17], [18]. All of these innovations enable precise force measurement or contact localization suitable for micromanipulation, but several of them also entail problems with fabrication cost, mechanical robustness, signal fidelity and temporal hysteresis, packaging and assembly limitations, and a lack of functional versatility that make them unfit for general-purpose micromanipulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the micro-nanoscale, mechanical measurements are often conducted using transducers based on microelectromechanical systems (MEMS), such as capacitive force sensors and piezoresistive cantilevers [19][20][21][22][23]. Compared to other cellular force measurement techniques, such as optical and magnetic tweezers [24,25], atomic force microscopy (AFM) [26,27], magnetic bead measurement [28] and micropipette aspiration [29], MEMS force sensors are more cost-effective and provide greater flexibility for system integration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method measured applied forces parallel and perpendicular to the wafer surface and provided nano-Newton sensitivity. 3 Chu et al 4 designed a capacitive force sensor with an integrated displacement reduction mechanism that provided milli-Newton sensitivity. However, these methods are intrusive and expensive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%