2020
DOI: 10.1109/tetc.2018.2789818
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Memory Physical Aware Multi-Level Fault Diagnosis Flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Harutyunyan et al investigated the impact of resistive defects in FinFET-based memories and concluded that such memories are more susceptible to dynamic faults [27] than memories designed with planar technologies. Due to this distinction, they proposed a FinFET-specific March algorithm [12] that relies on the execution of up to 8 consecutive operations applied to the same cell. Faults that require more than 8 consecutive operations are not sensitized, and hence not detected.…”
Section: Finfet Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Harutyunyan et al investigated the impact of resistive defects in FinFET-based memories and concluded that such memories are more susceptible to dynamic faults [27] than memories designed with planar technologies. Due to this distinction, they proposed a FinFET-specific March algorithm [12] that relies on the execution of up to 8 consecutive operations applied to the same cell. Faults that require more than 8 consecutive operations are not sensitized, and hence not detected.…”
Section: Finfet Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Weak resistive defects are known for causing dynamic faults, a subset of faults that are only sensitized by a sequence of consecutive operations. Many fault-oriented test approaches, such as standard March algorithms, do not target these types of faults [6][7][8] or are limited by the number of consecutive operations [9][10][11][12]. Using exhaustive March tests to sensitize faults results in expensive manufacturing tests, as the test cost is directly related to the time each product stays on the tester [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are various memory test algorithms were introduced to test the memory devices [6,[10][11][12]. The conventional test algorithms are zero-one and checkboard scan tests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New fault detection algorithms are proposed to detect memory faults, which are single-cell fault and two cells fault models. Some of the popular fault detection algorithms are Modified Algorithmic Test Sequence (MATS), MATS+, MATS++, Marching-1/0, March A, March B, March C, March C-, Extended March C-, March G, March X and March Y [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many test approaches to detect memory faults have been proposed in literature. Strong, deterministic faults can be detected by schemes that rely on logic faults observation, such as March algorithms [4][5][6][7][8]. Yet, many of these algorithms do not target or have limitations detecting hard-to-detect faults.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%