1981
DOI: 10.1037/0021-843x.90.3.187
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Memory failures in progressive idiopathic dementia.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
83
1
3

Year Published

1983
1983
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 198 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
10
83
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…reading for a highschool level adult) or a representation strongly activated (for example, following repeated exposures) will require more cognitive resources to be suppressed than few skilled processes or less activated representations. Due to their memory problem, AD patients process information less deeply than normal elderly [103], or they forget more quickly the information previously encoded (see for a review [85]). Consequently, the memory traces on which suppression will apply will be less strong in AD patients and suppression of that information will require less effort than for normal elderly subjects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…reading for a highschool level adult) or a representation strongly activated (for example, following repeated exposures) will require more cognitive resources to be suppressed than few skilled processes or less activated representations. Due to their memory problem, AD patients process information less deeply than normal elderly [103], or they forget more quickly the information previously encoded (see for a review [85]). Consequently, the memory traces on which suppression will apply will be less strong in AD patients and suppression of that information will require less effort than for normal elderly subjects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was the introduction of the semantic priming paradigm that could detect evidence of semantic relationships while minimizing the attentional and retrieval demands of tasks such as card sorting, that raised the real possibility that deficits other than semantic structure might account for the poor performance by aphasic individuals on semantic tasks (e.g., Milberg & Blumstein, 1981). Nebes, Martin, and Horn (1984) used these observations to test the then-emerging claim that patients with dementia suffered from a differential deficit in semantic knowledge (e.g., Weingartner, Kaye, Smallberg, & Ebert, 1981). The introduction of the semantic priming paradigm into the debate began what was to become a strange parallel universe of studies representing the degradation view (e.g., Chan, Salmon, Butters, & Johnson, 1995;Grober, Buschke, Kawas, & Fuld, 1985) and the impaired-access view of the semantic deficit of AD (e.g., Balota & Duchek, 1991;Nebes & Brady, 1991;Ober & Shenaut, 1988).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…or begin with a specified letter. As with confronta tion naming, word fluency is reduced in DAT [1,[6][7][8][9][10][11][12], it correlates highly with dementia severity [1] and allows discrimination of many DAT patients from controls, although mild cases cannot always be differentiated from controls [1]. Appell et al [6] report fluency to have been the least impaired of all language functions they tested.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%