2008
DOI: 10.1080/17405620701343204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Memory development in Libyan and Dutch school children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So, children who use shorter words for digits are expected to have longer memory spans. This model has been confirmed in a number of cross-cultural studies (e.g., Shebani, Van de Vijver, & Poortinga, 2005, 2008. Such a relatively simple explanation Learning and Individual Differences 20 (2010) …”
Section: Proposed Factors For Explaining the Achievement Differencessupporting
confidence: 53%
“…So, children who use shorter words for digits are expected to have longer memory spans. This model has been confirmed in a number of cross-cultural studies (e.g., Shebani, Van de Vijver, & Poortinga, 2005, 2008. Such a relatively simple explanation Learning and Individual Differences 20 (2010) …”
Section: Proposed Factors For Explaining the Achievement Differencessupporting
confidence: 53%
“…On the other hand, researchers may need to take a completely different approach to their analyses when data comprise a small number of cultural groups; analysis of covariance procedures serve this purpose well. For example, Shebani, van de Vijver, and Poortinga (2008) hypothesized that cross-cultural differences in the short-term memory digit span of Dutch and Libyan children could be explained by Baddeley’s (1997) phonological loop model, which predicts that speakers of languages with longer digits (measured as pronunciation speed) can hold fewer digits in their short-term memory. Consistent with Baddeley’s model because Arab digits are longer than Dutch digits, Libyan children pronounced fewer digits than Dutch children in a fixed amount of time thereby resulting in a longer digit span for Dutch children.…”
Section: Overarching Methodological Concerns In Cross-cultural Resear...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is general consensus that the simple translation of a neuropsychological test or test battery, developed in a certain country and culture, to another language and using it with patients from other countries or cultures is extremely problematic (International Test Commission, 2010;Manly & Echemendia, 2007;Nell, 2000;Puente, 1990). A recent review of neuropsychological studies conducted in Arab countries before 2016 (Fasfous et al, 2017) identified eight studies in the literature comparing neuropsychological function of Arab groups to Western or Israeli Jewish groups (Alansari & Baroun, 2004;Josman et al, 2006;Lieblich & Kugelmass, 1981;Parush et al, 2000;Shebani et al, 2008;Sobeh & Spijkers, 2012Stanczak et al, 2001). All of the eight studies demonstrated clear test performance differences between Arabs and other ethnic groups, emphasizing the importance of adapting cognitive measures to the local culture, language, or educational experience.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%