2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.lindif.2010.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the elusive nature of high Chinese achievement

Abstract: a b s t r a c tIt is argued that Stankov's proposal to view unforgivingness as underlying the combination of high educational achievement, anxiety, and self-doubt is an original way of summarizing Confucian score patterns. However, it is argued that the proposal cannot explain why reading scores in Confucian countries are not higher than in other countries and that an empirical study to test the proposal is difficult to conduct as it would require the involvement of many different countries.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present study used Chinese students. A few studies have shown that Confucian Asian students experience higher levels of mathematics anxiety and mathematics self-doubt than do students from other parts of the world [ 73 , 81 ]. Because mathematics is a major key to success in so many fields, it is therefore easily conceivable that those affective elements impact mathematics learning, and possibly subsequent achievement in areas which rely on mathematics skills (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present study used Chinese students. A few studies have shown that Confucian Asian students experience higher levels of mathematics anxiety and mathematics self-doubt than do students from other parts of the world [ 73 , 81 ]. Because mathematics is a major key to success in so many fields, it is therefore easily conceivable that those affective elements impact mathematics learning, and possibly subsequent achievement in areas which rely on mathematics skills (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, researchers used rather small numbers of countries, which makes it difficult to deduce which country characteristics might drive the detected differences (cf. van de Vijver, 2010). Second, these academic faking studies employed self-report questionnaires, which might be biased due to social desirability effects (e.g., Tsai, 2011).…”
Section: Academic Fakingmentioning
confidence: 99%