2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0887-6185(00)00037-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Memory Bias for Emotional Information in Children and Adolescents with Posttraumatic Stress Disorder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
65
1
4

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
4
65
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Our regressions revealed no significant memory differences between maltreated and nonmaltreated participants, or participants with higher (rather than lower) levels of trauma-related psychopathology, for negative event information. Research has indicated that children and adolescents with trauma histories may have heightened attention to negative stimuli, and perhaps even advanced emotional understanding of negative information (Frankenhuis & de Weerth, 2013;Moradi et al, 2000). Although our results do not fully support this theory, one possible explanation for our findings concerns the type of emotional content in the negative stimulus.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our regressions revealed no significant memory differences between maltreated and nonmaltreated participants, or participants with higher (rather than lower) levels of trauma-related psychopathology, for negative event information. Research has indicated that children and adolescents with trauma histories may have heightened attention to negative stimuli, and perhaps even advanced emotional understanding of negative information (Frankenhuis & de Weerth, 2013;Moradi et al, 2000). Although our results do not fully support this theory, one possible explanation for our findings concerns the type of emotional content in the negative stimulus.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 80%
“…Beers and De Bellis (2002) also did not obtain significant differences while examining memory and learning performance in adolescents with and without PTSD diagnoses. However, Moradi, Taghavi, Neshat-Doost, Yule, and Dalgleish (2000) found that adolescents with PTSD performed significantly worse than typically developing adolescents on an everyday memory task. Of interest, adolescents with PTSD showed a bias for recalling negative information, above positive and neutral information.…”
Section: Psychopathology Maltreatment and Memorymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Several studies have found increased implicit and explicit emotional memory functions in patients with PTSD (17)(18)(19), but also the opposite has been reported (20). It is important to note that data on memory performance acquired in patients with PTSD are difficult to interpret, because changes in mood, motivation, attention, or arousal can indirectly affect memory performance in both directions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Although both the dot-probe task and the Stroop task have been used to measure threat-related attentional bias, reliability across these tasks has not been established. In an attempt to compare these tasks, Dalgleish et al (2003) combined and analyzed data from previous studies assessing attentional bias and memory bias in AD and NAD youth (Dalgleish et al, , 2001Moradi et al, 1999Moradi et al, , 2000, 1999aTaghavi et al, 1999Taghavi et al, , 2003. Their sample included 7-18-year-old youth suffering from GAD (n = 24), PTSD (n = 24), or major depressive disorder or dysthymia (n = 19), as well as controls with no history of psychiatric disorder (n = 26).…”
Section: Studies Using the Dot-probe Detection Taskmentioning
confidence: 99%