2000
DOI: 10.1080/10643380091184165
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Membrane Separation Bioreactors for Wastewater Treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
182
1
14

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 447 publications
(199 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
2
182
1
14
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted that MBR works at relatively high dissolved oxygen concentrations. The shortest HRT mentioned in the literature, not requiring clogging preventing aeration, are in the range of 2-3 h (Visvanathan and Abeynayaka, 2012;Visvanathan et al, 2000). On the other hand, there were noted longer hydraulic retention times preferred for attached biomass reactors (e.g.…”
Section: Hydraulic Retention Timementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It should be noted that MBR works at relatively high dissolved oxygen concentrations. The shortest HRT mentioned in the literature, not requiring clogging preventing aeration, are in the range of 2-3 h (Visvanathan and Abeynayaka, 2012;Visvanathan et al, 2000). On the other hand, there were noted longer hydraulic retention times preferred for attached biomass reactors (e.g.…”
Section: Hydraulic Retention Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other relatively short HRTs (about 4 h) mentioned in the literature are related mostly to submerged membrane bioreactor (Jadhao and Dawande, 2013;Visvanathan et al, 2000). These reactors can be operated at short HRT thanks to the presence of membrane as a device for activated sludge collection.…”
Section: Hydraulic Retention Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, sewage treatment plant effluents are important sources responsible for occurrence of many micropollutants in downstream water bodies. Compared to CAS, membrane bioreactors (MBR) can achieve better effluent quality regarding basic water quality parameters such as total organic carbon (TOC) and total nitrogen (TN) (Visvanathan et al, 2000). However, the superiority of MBR over CAS in the case of poorly biodegradable micropollutants remains uncertain (Bernhard et al, 2006;Clara et al, 2005;Weiss and Reemtsma, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Submerged membrane bioreactor, since its introduction in 1980s [2] as a costeffective alternative to sidestream membrane bioreactor (by virtue of eliminating need of recirculation of mixed liquor between bioreactor and membrane unit), over the years has been successfully used to different domestic and industrial wastewater treatment, involving, among others, hollow fiber and flat sheet membranes [3]. Membrane fouling, an inevitable consequence of interactions between membrane and the mixed liquor, however, impedes widespread use of MBR technology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%