1994
DOI: 10.1016/s0065-1281(11)80002-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Membrane-bound proteases of the gerbil subfornical organ and choroid plexus: an enzyme histochemical study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results demonstrate differences in the spectrum of enzymes on vessels of the ChP in comparison to vessels of SFO; and probably also reflect differences in the enzymatic barrier to blood-borne hormones in these two vascular compartments. It should be noted that a similar enzyme cytochemical study was performed in the gerbil (16), showing differences in the distribution and activity levels of the enzymes in comparison to the guinea pig in this present study. The most significant difference between the two species was the distribution of r-GTP in ChP, i. e. , in the guinea pig the vascular endothelium was negative and the epithelium was positive, whereas in the gerbil vascular endothelium was positive and the epithelium was negative.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…These results demonstrate differences in the spectrum of enzymes on vessels of the ChP in comparison to vessels of SFO; and probably also reflect differences in the enzymatic barrier to blood-borne hormones in these two vascular compartments. It should be noted that a similar enzyme cytochemical study was performed in the gerbil (16), showing differences in the distribution and activity levels of the enzymes in comparison to the guinea pig in this present study. The most significant difference between the two species was the distribution of r-GTP in ChP, i. e. , in the guinea pig the vascular endothelium was negative and the epithelium was positive, whereas in the gerbil vascular endothelium was positive and the epithelium was negative.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%