Synthetic Polymer-Polymer Composites 2012
DOI: 10.3139/9781569905258.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Melting of Polymer-Polymer Composites by Particulate Heating Promoters and Electromagnetic Radiation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All the nanocomposites were produced with the same processing conditions. The fillers were incorporated via masterbatch produced in a previous process where MLG loading of 15% were produced under the following optimized conditions [16]: highly dispersive screw configuration, 600 rpm and temperature profile 260 o C / 220 o C / 220 o C /210 o C / 200 o C / 190 o C. Masterbatch dilutions were processed with the same temperature profile with a screw speed of 800 rpm and using a highly dispersive screw. Samples were obtained by compression molding in a hot press (COLLIN model P200E) at 200 o C/15 bars during 15 min.…”
Section: Sample Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All the nanocomposites were produced with the same processing conditions. The fillers were incorporated via masterbatch produced in a previous process where MLG loading of 15% were produced under the following optimized conditions [16]: highly dispersive screw configuration, 600 rpm and temperature profile 260 o C / 220 o C / 220 o C /210 o C / 200 o C / 190 o C. Masterbatch dilutions were processed with the same temperature profile with a screw speed of 800 rpm and using a highly dispersive screw. Samples were obtained by compression molding in a hot press (COLLIN model P200E) at 200 o C/15 bars during 15 min.…”
Section: Sample Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous experiments with Multiwall carbon nanotubes (MWCNT) [4] and multilayer graphene (MLG) nanoparticles have been performed over a polypropylene matrix; microwave heating has been used to estimate the effects of the filler in the polymer matrix [16], taking advantage of the fact that the polymer matrix exhibits a low dielectric loss in the GHz region [17]. Carbon nanotubes are more susceptible to microwave radiation than graphene multilayers, proving that graphene multilayers could be a better filler than the carbon nanotubes [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Incorporation of suitable (nano)particles in the matrix or matrix-giving component acting as hot spots (heat sources) by external triggering (electromagnetic field, microwave etc.) seems to be a sound strategy [161,162]. To solve the quality assurance in line during production is also imperative.…”
Section: Outlook and Future Trendsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The susceptor particles are Iron particles, produced by Acros Organics, with an average size of 200 µm. These particles have been chosen because of their superior heat-generating properties compared to other susceptor materials, such as Nickel or Magnetite, as found in literature [10,16].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research has shown that different susceptor particles show different heating characteristics [9]. Also susceptor-size and weight percentage have a significant impact [10,11]. In general, smaller sizes and higher particle content increase heat generation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%