1977
DOI: 10.1039/f19777300680
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Melting of ice in porous solids

Abstract: Differential scanning calorimetry (d.s.c.) and nuclear magnetic resonance (n.m.r.) techniques were used to study the melting of ice in porous solids.At low water contents (less than about three monolayers) no freezing or melting was observed. As the water content was increased, a single melting peak was observed as the pores filled. The amplitude of this peak reached a constant value when the pores were completely filled, and then at higher water contents a second peak was observed increasing in amplitude as m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
93
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
9
93
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Earlier studies by DSC pointed out that melting point depression of bulk materials in a nanoconfined environment is common for both liquid and solid guest phases, including water (33)(34)(35), benzene (36,37), cyclohexane (36), heptanes (36), o-terphenyl (38), benzyl alcohol (38), ibuprofen (36,39), and glycine (40). Similar behavior was also found in a system containing metal clusters; confined iridium clusters in controlled-pore glass showed lower melting point as pore size decreased (41).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Earlier studies by DSC pointed out that melting point depression of bulk materials in a nanoconfined environment is common for both liquid and solid guest phases, including water (33)(34)(35), benzene (36,37), cyclohexane (36), heptanes (36), o-terphenyl (38), benzyl alcohol (38), ibuprofen (36,39), and glycine (40). Similar behavior was also found in a system containing metal clusters; confined iridium clusters in controlled-pore glass showed lower melting point as pore size decreased (41).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…As early as the 1960s, Litvan et al reported that confined water molecules bond strongly onto the wall of silica pores and show nonbulk behavior (46). In later reports, Rennie et al suggested that in addition to the tightly bound water near the pore walls, the water at the center of the pores showed behavior similar to that of bulk water, with greater mobility (33). Additionally, recent work by Erko et al revealed that upon confinement, water showed a two-step density profile with two layers of water near the pore wall having higher density than the core water (47).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…As the T 1 of ice is about 2 s (25) or more, the observed minimum T 1 of 0.1 s indicates that the surface water remains unfrozen even when water in the bulk region freezes and that the apparent minimum T 1 is attributed to the T 1s of the unfrozen surface water. The presence of an unfrozen interfacial layer of water separating ice from surfaces has been detected in many water-surface systems (10,13,31), and unfrozen water has been considered to play a major role in the freezing-thawing mechanism of the system (32). In Fig.…”
Section: Nmr Linewidthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique, called thermoporosimetry, was initially developed for measuring pore size distribution in other materials (28)(29)(30) but has been � � Tools for the Characterization of Biomass at the Nanometer Scale 65 successfully applied to pulp fibers (31,32). The relations between the specific melting enthalpy and pore size are described by the Gibbs-Thompson equation:…”
Section: Porosimetry By Differential Scanning Calorimetrymentioning
confidence: 99%