2000
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-84782000000500031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Melhoramento genético para tolerância ao frio em arroz irrigado

Abstract: O melhoramento genético para tolerância ao frio é apresentado como estratégia para enfrentar o problema de temperatura baixa no Rio Grande do Sul durante o período de cultivo do arroz irrigado. A ocorrência de temperaturas baixas em outros países é comparada com a situação no sul do Brasil. Os estádios de desenvolvimento da planta mais afetados pela temperatura baixa, as estratégias de seleção disponíveis sob condições controladas e os problemas encontrados para o melhoramento dessa característica são discutid… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
54
0
20

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(19 reference statements)
1
54
0
20
Order By: Relevance
“…However, because each characteristic makes its contribution to the variability of an individual and no characteristic alone is responsible for total variation, the elimination of less informative descriptors should facilitate interpretations without causing substantial loss of information and ensure reductions in required resources, contributing to more accurate measurement of the most important traits for morphological characterization [18]. In this study, not all the IPGRI descriptors selected for morphological evaluation were useful for discrimination purposes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…However, because each characteristic makes its contribution to the variability of an individual and no characteristic alone is responsible for total variation, the elimination of less informative descriptors should facilitate interpretations without causing substantial loss of information and ensure reductions in required resources, contributing to more accurate measurement of the most important traits for morphological characterization [18]. In this study, not all the IPGRI descriptors selected for morphological evaluation were useful for discrimination purposes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The less representative features in the genetic diversity of the studied populations were BH, AAD, PdL, and IOW, which displayed the highest coefficients in the canonic variable of lowest importance (CV2, Table 2). Less important characters are either invariant or redundant, i.e., they are represented by other highly correlated characters (individually or grouped) (Cruz and Carneiro, 2003).…”
Section: Morphometric Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Cruz and Carneiro (2003), such studies must include a number of variables to explain, at least, 80% of the observed variation. In the present work, the first two canonic variables were sufficient to evaluate the morphometric differentiation among populations, since, together, they explained 100% of the original variation.…”
Section: Morphometric Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No período reprodutivo, os sintomas de dano pelo frio são má inserção da panícula, esterilidade e manchas nas espiguetas (SOUZA, 1990). CRUZ & MILACH (2000), em um estudo de capacidade Médias seguidas por diferentes letras na coluna diferem entre si, pelo teste de Scott-Knott, a 5% de probabilidade.…”
Section: Results Of the First Count Test (G1) Final Count Of The Gerunclassified