2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2023.100727
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MELD 3.0 adequately predicts mortality and renal replacement therapy requirements in patients with alcohol-associated hepatitis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(65 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among static models, the MELD score has been demonstrated to be the most effective static scoring system 26,27 . The new MELD 3.0 score was recently released, evidencing a similar performance to the original MELD score in terms of mortality prediction, but with better performance to predict the need for renal replacement therapy 28 …”
Section: Use Of Prognostic Scores In Alcohol‐associated Hepatitismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among static models, the MELD score has been demonstrated to be the most effective static scoring system 26,27 . The new MELD 3.0 score was recently released, evidencing a similar performance to the original MELD score in terms of mortality prediction, but with better performance to predict the need for renal replacement therapy 28 …”
Section: Use Of Prognostic Scores In Alcohol‐associated Hepatitismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further analysis comparing several scores showed the MELD score to be the best score in assessing short-term mortality risk with ROC > 0.77 (157). Although MELD-Na and MELD are similar in predicting short-term mortality in AH (172), MELD 3.0 has been recently shown to have equivalent performance to MELD and may have utility to predict need for renal replacement therapy though further validation is needed (173).…”
Section: Ahmentioning
confidence: 99%