2015
DOI: 10.1111/nph.13499
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meiosis evolves: adaptation to external and internal environments

Abstract: 306I.306II.307III.312IV.317V.318319References319 Summary Meiosis is essential for the fertility of most eukaryotes and its structures and progression are conserved across kingdoms. Yet many of its core proteins show evidence of rapid or adaptive evolution. What drives the evolution of meiosis proteins? How can constrained meiotic processes be modified in response to challenges without compromising their essential functions? In surveying the literature, we found evidence of two especially potent challenges to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
169
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 163 publications
(199 citation statements)
references
References 221 publications
(355 reference statements)
9
169
1
Order By: Relevance
“…2 Nucleosome is the basic unit of chromosomes, it is composed of octamers of the core histone proteins and approximately 146 base pairs of DNA. A nucleosome contains 2 H2A/ H2B dimers and one H3/H4 tetramer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Nucleosome is the basic unit of chromosomes, it is composed of octamers of the core histone proteins and approximately 146 base pairs of DNA. A nucleosome contains 2 H2A/ H2B dimers and one H3/H4 tetramer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diakinesis cells of the Thai KPS 01-01-25 sugarcane exhibited not only true chiasma bonds between homologs/homeologs, but also secondary chromosome associations resulting from loose bivalents in the absence of chiasmata (Thumjamras et al, 2016). This reduction in chiasma frequency may also indicate how sensitive the structural meiotic components are to disturbance, and could be a direct consequence of meiotic adaptation to genomic challenges (Bomblies et al, 2015). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference in RAD-51 foci between female/male vs. hermaphrodite/male species is not merely a consequence of the decrease in genome size attributed to hermaphroditism (Fierst et al 2015), as we observe two to three times the number of RAD-51 foci in C. remanei and C. brenneri, which have only 30% larger genomes compared to C. elegans and C. briggsae. Environmental differences, particularly temperature, have also been shown to influence recombination (Bomblies et al 2015), suggesting that the differences in DSBs could be a consequence of these species' ecology. However, the Caenorhabditis species examined here have been shown to cohabitate and are relatively cosmopolitan in their distribution, except C. brenneri, which is restricted to tropical zones (Kiontke et al 2011).…”
Section: Dsb Levels Vary Considerably Between Caenorhabditis Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%