Mehrsprachiges Lesetheater 2017
DOI: 10.3224/84742121.04
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mehrsprachiges Lesetheater: Ergebnisse zur Akzeptanz dieser neuen mehrsprachigen Lesefördermethode

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MELT was developed with the DBR approach in several cycles and additionally researched through an acceptance study (Kutzelmann et al, 2017). Results from the study showed that teachers see a clear benefit (Götz et al, 2017) and appreciate the clearly structured, varied didactic-methodological design in MELT with its easily available, dramatised texts. Multilingualism appears to be predominantly unproblematic and, according to the teachers, offers a clear added value ("relative advantage, " Venkatesh et al, 2003) for reading training in school and foreign languages compared to conventional language teaching.…”
Section: Reading Fluencymentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…MELT was developed with the DBR approach in several cycles and additionally researched through an acceptance study (Kutzelmann et al, 2017). Results from the study showed that teachers see a clear benefit (Götz et al, 2017) and appreciate the clearly structured, varied didactic-methodological design in MELT with its easily available, dramatised texts. Multilingualism appears to be predominantly unproblematic and, according to the teachers, offers a clear added value ("relative advantage, " Venkatesh et al, 2003) for reading training in school and foreign languages compared to conventional language teaching.…”
Section: Reading Fluencymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Multilingualism appears to be predominantly unproblematic and, according to the teachers, offers a clear added value ("relative advantage, " Venkatesh et al, 2003) for reading training in school and foreign languages compared to conventional language teaching. Other design components, such as the integration of migration languages, reading aloud by the teacher, cooperative learning, etc., were also judged very positively (Götz et al, 2017). However, a more comprehensive long-term study surveying the development of RF in MELT is lacking to date.…”
Section: Reading Fluencymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation