2023
DOI: 10.1111/geb.13791
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Megafire: An ambiguous and emotive term best avoided by science

Cathelijne R. Stoof,
Jasper R. de Vries,
Marc Castellnou Ribau
et al.

Abstract: BackgroundAs fire regimes are changing and wildfire disasters are becoming more frequent, the term megafire is increasingly used to describe impactful wildfires, under multiple meanings, both in academia and popular media. This has resulted in a highly ambiguous concept.ApproachWe analysed the use of the term ‘megafire’ in popular media to determine its origin, its developments over time, and its meaning in the public sphere. We subsequently discuss how relative the term ‘mega’ is, and put this in the context … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 50 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We expect that capacity-building activities in these countries will be diverse, require customisation and not all will be suitable for a specific strategy. The framing of transport issues is crucial in this regard, as how a problem is framed significantly influences policy formulation and implementation [111]. Those involved in capacity building must recognize their strengths and weaknesses, as well as those of the target, for better and more sustainable results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We expect that capacity-building activities in these countries will be diverse, require customisation and not all will be suitable for a specific strategy. The framing of transport issues is crucial in this regard, as how a problem is framed significantly influences policy formulation and implementation [111]. Those involved in capacity building must recognize their strengths and weaknesses, as well as those of the target, for better and more sustainable results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%