2020 25th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/icpr48806.2021.9413053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MEG: Multi-Evidence GNN for Multimodal Semantic Forensics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the face images in the fake videos are generated frame by frame, the Auto-Encoders does not consider the previous images when generating, which often leads to multiple anomalies in some areas between the previous and subsequent frames. Inspired by [17], Sabir et al [18] propose to combine temporal network and face preprocessing techniques to detect tampered videos. The video will destroy the continuity between adjacent frames, resulting in the above detection method not performing well under compression.…”
Section: Video-level Detection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the face images in the fake videos are generated frame by frame, the Auto-Encoders does not consider the previous images when generating, which often leads to multiple anomalies in some areas between the previous and subsequent frames. Inspired by [17], Sabir et al [18] propose to combine temporal network and face preprocessing techniques to detect tampered videos. The video will destroy the continuity between adjacent frames, resulting in the above detection method not performing well under compression.…”
Section: Video-level Detection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later approaches employ deep learning (DL) to capture high-level forgery features. Most DL-based face forgery detection methods use convolutional neural networks (CNNs) [23,21,9,25,24,20] or recurrent neural networks (RNNs) [18,26] for detection. Former focuses solely on spatial information, while later con-siders temporal features as well.…”
Section: Face Forgery Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, if the true overlap in pixels for < a, a + > and < a, a − > is o + and o − , the flexible margin m f lex is shown in (2), where d is the patch dimension. Then the flexible margin ranking loss L f lex is calculated as (3).…”
Section: Lossmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prevalent manifestions of misinformation include fake news, digitally manipulated images, deepfake videos and more. Efforts towards the development of automated detection methods for fake news [1,2,3], natural-image forensics [4,5,6] and deepfakes [7,8,9] have gained traction. However, an important yet almost neglected field is that of biomedical image forensics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%