2009
DOI: 10.1177/1558689809335973
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meeting the Challenge of Doing an RCT Evaluation of Youth Mentoring in Ireland

Abstract: The youth mentoring program Big Brothers Big Sisters is one of the first social interventions involving youth in Ireland to be evaluated using a randomized controlled trial methodology. This article sets out the design process undertaken, describing how the research team came to adopt a concurrent embedded mixed methods design as a means of balancing ethical, feasibility, and scientific issues associated with the randomized controlled trial method, establishing an epistemological position and integrating data … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A key difficulty in relation to using experimental designs as a method of understanding behavior change in the field, is the linear understanding of causality and the lack of attention to context (Brady & O'Regan, 2009). Methods for integrating qualitative and quantitative findings are available to overcome this problem, but currently, such methods represent relatively uncharted territory.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A key difficulty in relation to using experimental designs as a method of understanding behavior change in the field, is the linear understanding of causality and the lack of attention to context (Brady & O'Regan, 2009). Methods for integrating qualitative and quantitative findings are available to overcome this problem, but currently, such methods represent relatively uncharted territory.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While such studies are strong on causality, they are considered problematic for a range of epistemological, ontological and practical reasons (Jacobs, 2003;Plath, 2014). It is argued that the use of RCT methodologies in the social world is difficult due to the need to have an adequate sample size, address ethical concerns and to prevent demoralisation of the control group (Brady and O'Regan, 2009). The EBP movement is also criticised for its focus on outcomes or impact as measured by evaluation, while overlooking the process by which outcomes occurred and discounting practitioner knowledge and expertise (Nevo and Slonim Nevo, 2011).…”
Section: Evidence Based Practice Evidence Informed Practice and Youtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Study 1, the quantitative component of the research, sits in the positivist tradition which views patterns of behaviour as observable and explainable through objective causal laws in science (Fossey, Harvey, McDermott, & Davidson, 2002;Rubin & Babbie, 1989). Study 2, the qualitative component of the research, adopts an interpretive stance (Brady & O'Regan, 2009;Weber, 2003). Further details of how these different paradigms sit together are contained within the Methodology Chapter (Chapter 4).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It uses a deductive approach for the purpose of testing the study's hypotheses (Bryman, 2008). Study 2, the qualitative component of the research, adopts an interpretive stance (Brady & O'Regan, 2009;Weber, 2003) and is inductive. A qualitative methodology affords detailed insight into a specific social interchange, in this case, to gain an understanding of supervisees and supervisors perceived and constructed meaning of their clinical supervision experience (Fossey et al, 2002;Padgett, 1998).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation