Meeting profiles: size, duration, and location

Panko, Raymond R.; Kinney, Susan T.

doi:10.1109/hicss.1995.375647

Cited by 17 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…We conducted interviews, observed meetings and collected questionnaire data. Such triangulation may yield more reliable data than the use of only one data source because what people report is not always consistent with reality; for example, people tend to underestimate the amount of time they spend in face-to-face meetings when they are asked how much time they spend in various activities (Panko and Kinney, 1995). Interviews yield subjective data; however, the more interviewees stating the same opinion, the less likely bias is associated with that opinion (Diefenbach, 2009).…”

Section: Limitationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The daily stand-up meeting: A grounded theory study

Stray

Sjøberg

Dybå

2016

Journal of Systems and Software

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Context: The daily stand-up meeting is one of the most used agile practices but has rarely been the subject of empirical research. Aim: The present study aims to identify how daily stand-up meetings are conducted and what the attitudes towards them are. Method: A grounded theory study of the daily stand-up meeting was conducted with twelve software teams in three companies in Malaysia, Norway, Poland and the United Kingdom. We interviewed 60 people, observed 79 daily stand-up meetings and collected supplementary data. Results: The factors that contributed the most to a positive attitude towards the daily stand-up meeting were information sharing with the team and the opportunity to discuss and solve problems. The factors that contributed the most to a negative attitude were status reporting to the manager and spending too much time; both the frequency and duration of the meeting were perceived to be too much. Based on our results, we developed a grounded theory of daily stand-up meetings and proposed evidencebased guidelines on how to organize them. Conclusion: Organizations should be aware of the factors that may affect attitude towards daily stand-up meetings and should consider our proposed guidelines to improve the way the meetings are conducted.

show abstract

Section: Limitationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The daily stand-up meeting: A grounded theory study

Stray

Sjøberg

Dybå

2016

Journal of Systems and Software

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…These parameters are derived from [23,26,27]. Specifically, the mean time between meetings is 18 minutes while Table 3 gives the remaining of the model parameters.…”

Section: Task Modelmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The work activity is modeled in a more complicated manner that focuses on modeling meetings. Specifically, [23,26,27] have collected data on the frequency, size, and durations of meetings; [26] Table 3 Meetings model parameters of meetings followed by working in the node's office. This process repeats until the work activity is complete.…”

Section: Task Modelmentioning

confidence: 99%

Realistic mobility simulation of urban mesh networks

2009

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

It is a truism that today's simulations of mobile wireless networks are not realistic. In realistic simulations of urban networks, the mobility of vehicles and pedestrians is greatly influenced by the environment (e.g., the location of buildings) as well as by interaction with other nodes. For example, on a congested street or sidewalk, nodes cannot travel at their desired speed. Furthermore, the location of streets, sidewalks, hallways, etc. restricts the position of nodes, and traffic lights impact the flow of nodes. And finally, people do not wander the simulated region at random, rather, their mobility depends on whether the person is at work, at lunch, etc. In this paper, realistic simulation of mobility for urban wireless networks is addressed. In contrast to most other mobility modeling efforts, most of the aspects of the presented mobility model and model parameters are derived from surveys from urban planning and traffic engineering research. The mobility model discussed here is part of the UDel Models, a suite of tools for realistic simulation of urban wireless networks. The UDel Models simulation tools are available online.

show abstract

“…We considered timeframes with average size 70 timestamps (roughly 5 minutes). This choice of timeframe comes from the minimum meeting time considered in the research done on meeting profiles by Panko and Kinney [1995].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Learning about meetings

Kim

Rudin

2014

Data Min Knowl Disc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Most people participate in meetings almost every day, multiple times a day. The study of meetings is important, but also challenging, as it requires an understanding of social signals and complex interpersonal dynamics. Our aim this work is to use a data-driven approach to the science of meetings. We provide tentative evidence that: i) it is possible to automatically detect when during the meeting a key decision is taking place, from analyzing only the local dialogue acts, ii) there are common patterns in the way social dialogue acts are interspersed throughout a meeting, iii) at the time key decisions are made, the amount of time left in the meeting can be predicted from the amount of time that has passed, iv) it is often possible to predict whether a proposal during a meeting will be accepted or rejected based entirely on the language (the set of persuasive words) used by the speaker.

show abstract

Meeting profiles: size, duration, and location

Cited by 17 publications

References 27 publications

The daily stand-up meeting: A grounded theory study

The daily stand-up meeting: A grounded theory study

Realistic mobility simulation of urban mesh networks

Learning about meetings

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About