2013
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2205638
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meet the Press: How Voters and Politicians Respond to Newspaper Entry and Exit

Abstract: This paper uses an original dataset covering the presence of local news in medium-large Italian cities in the period 1993-2010 to evaluate the effects of newspaper entry and exit on electoral participation, political selection, and government efficiency. Exploiting discrete changes in the number of newspapers, we show that newspaper entry increases turnout in municipal elections, the reelection probability of the incumbent mayor, and the efficiency of the municipal government. We do not find any effect on the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
65
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
5
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Turnout shows no relation to rainfall on the day of the next presidential election, and it also shows no relation to daily rainfall within the two weeks before and after the current election day. These results confirm that only rainfall that fell precisely on the current and previous election 2 Prior empirical research in economics has focused predominantly on the contemporaneous effects of pivot probabilities (Agranov 2012;Hoffman, Morgan, and Raymond 2013), voting costs (Charles and Stephens 2013), and the media (Stromberg 2004;Gentzkow 2006;DellaVigna and Kaplan 2007;Enikolopov, Petrova, and Zhuravskaya 2011;Gentzkow, Shapiro, and Sinkinson 2011;Drago, Nannicini, and Sobbrio 2014;Falck, Gold, and Heblich 2014) on turnout.…”
supporting
confidence: 57%
“…Turnout shows no relation to rainfall on the day of the next presidential election, and it also shows no relation to daily rainfall within the two weeks before and after the current election day. These results confirm that only rainfall that fell precisely on the current and previous election 2 Prior empirical research in economics has focused predominantly on the contemporaneous effects of pivot probabilities (Agranov 2012;Hoffman, Morgan, and Raymond 2013), voting costs (Charles and Stephens 2013), and the media (Stromberg 2004;Gentzkow 2006;DellaVigna and Kaplan 2007;Enikolopov, Petrova, and Zhuravskaya 2011;Gentzkow, Shapiro, and Sinkinson 2011;Drago, Nannicini, and Sobbrio 2014;Falck, Gold, and Heblich 2014) on turnout.…”
supporting
confidence: 57%
“…Overall, this result points out the presence of a negative relation between the extremism of the ideological preferences of media editors (or, more generally, journalists) and the accuracy of news reports. 21 Hence, the above Corollary sheds light on an issue which has not been addressed in the literature and that represents an additional element to enhance the understanding of the market for news. In particular, the evidence provided by Figure Finally, as expected, when the cost of sampling is higher, editors will make more "errors"…”
Section: Corollarymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…and given (21) and (22) derived in the proof of Proposition 1, the sign of dE(|ne|) dδ will be equivalent to the one of the following expression:…”
Section: Proof Of Propositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Section II describes our data. Section III 7 Most of this literature is focused on the impact of media on people's behavior and policies in democracies such as the United States (e.g., DellaVigna and Kaplan 2007;Gentzkow, Shapiro, and Sinkinson 2011;Snyder and Strömberg 2010;Eisensee and Strömberg 2007;and Chiang and Knight 2011) or Italy (e.g., Barone, D'Acunto, and Narciso 2015; Drago, Nannincini, and Sobbrio 2014;and Durante, Pinotti, and Tesei 2015). For a thorough overview of this literature, see DellaVigna and Gentzkow (2010), Prat and Strömberg (2013), Enikolopov and Petrova (2015), and Strömberg (2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%