Medicine, Empires, and Ethics in Colonial Africa

Abstract

This essay examines the history of European empire building and health work in sub-Saharan Africa, focusing on four patterns that shed light on the ethics of outside interventions: (1) the epidemiological and bodily harms caused by conquest and economic development; (2) the uneven and inadequate health infrastructures established during the colonial era, including certain iatrogenic consequences; (3) the ethical ambiguities and transgressions of colonial research and treatment campaigns; and (4) the concerted and inadvertent efforts to undermine African healing practices, which were not always commensurable with introduced medical techniques. This kind of historical analysis helps us home in on different kinds of ethical problems that have grown out of past asymmetries of power-between people, professions, states, and institutions-that shape the nature of international health systems to this day.

Pediatric Oncology Clinical Trials and Collaborative Research in Africa: Current Landscape and Future Perspectives

“… 50 The reluctance of governments and populations in Africa to participate in trials could be the result of historical transgressions and ethical ambiguities of colonial research and treatment campaigns while marginalizing African therapeutics and traditional healing. 51 These many challenges may seem insurmountable to the creation of a complex and locally responsive research agenda, but there are many encouraging developments.…”

Decolonising global health in the time of COVID-19

“…Tropical medicine not only operated in the service of colonial exploitation, it was itself an exploitative practice. In her study of medical research in African colonies, historian Helen Tilley (2016) notes that there were few, if any ethical standards for research in the colonial era. Physicians dedicated to researching and controlling sleeping sickness engaged in mass forced displacement, unnecessary procedures, and administration of highly toxic drugs, yet likely viewed themselves as saviours, advancing science and saving vulnerable populations that could not otherwise protect themselves from disease.…”

“…66-73). There were deliberate efforts to marginalise, and even criminalise indigenous healing practices (Tilley, 2016). The post of physician was initially limited to Europeans, and even as these restrictions loosened, access to full medical education remained limited for Africans in the colonies (Monekosso, 2014;Neill, 2012, p. 61).…”

Principles of research ethics: A research primer for low- and middle-income countries

“…Some authors argue that these principles are less relevant in populations where community rather than individual values are stressed. Others argue that local development of research ethics is crucial to ensuring buy-in and avoiding bioethical imperialism [ 11 , 12 ]. Acknowledging the past abuses that took place under the guise of research, Western ethical thought now insists on voluntary consent, with special protections for traditionally vulnerable populations such as children, women, and ethnic minorities.…”