2022
DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10040723
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Medical Students’ Perceptions towards Digitization and Artificial Intelligence: A Mixed-Methods Study

Abstract: Digital technologies in health care, including artificial intelligence (AI) and robotics, constantly increase. The aim of this study was to explore attitudes of 2020 medical students’ generation towards various aspects of eHealth technologies with the focus on AI using an exploratory sequential mixed-method analysis. Data from semi-structured interviews with 28 students from five medical faculties were used to construct an online survey send to about 80,000 medical students in Germany. Most students expressed … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Medical students in general, as reflected in this study, currently have no job-related concerns about digitalization [ 84 ]. Medical students, however, have very controversial attitudes towards the medical field of radiology regarding possible changes due to digitalization [ 85 , 86 , 87 , 88 , 89 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Medical students in general, as reflected in this study, currently have no job-related concerns about digitalization [ 84 ]. Medical students, however, have very controversial attitudes towards the medical field of radiology regarding possible changes due to digitalization [ 85 , 86 , 87 , 88 , 89 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AI presents a unique situation here, as there are qualitative differences for issues of explainability, health equity, and data security [ 96 , 97 , 98 , 99 ]. While students are to some extent well aware of the possibilities and limitations of AI [ 85 , 100 ], it has also been shown that the absence of such content in the curriculum leads to helplessness, anxiety, and altered career choices in dealing with this topic and should therefore be urgently included as a digital literacy in the compulsory medical school curriculum [ 84 , 88 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have investigated the attitudes of healthcare workforces worldwide and have mostly included students and doctors. Most studies that have investigated the attitudes of students toward AI and digital healthcare-based applications, tools and systems reported the positive mindset of students [ 20 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 ]. However, in some studies, students were found to be pessimistic toward the digitization of health services [ 22 , 23 ].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the entire digitalization effort has become stagnated. Inadequate digital health literacy and competency have been identified by several studies as the main obstacles to the digitization of healthcare in countries that have initiated the transformation [ 19 , 20 , 21 ]. Health professionals are the key players in the digital health system, and digitalization will change their roles and duties in an unprecedented way.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AI algorithms have been shown to be effective in a variety of medical professions, including radiology, ophthalmology, dermatology, pathology, and pulmonary medicine, according to studies (Gillissen et al, 2022).Any system that uses data processing and pattern recognition to simulate cognitive capabilities such as learning and problem solving is referred to as AI. As these systems move closer to clinical use, physicians must comprehend the fundamental concepts of AI in order to interpret the results correctly (Valikodath et al, 2021).Over the last few years, the clinical usage of AI systems in medicine has grown in popularity (Sur et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%