2002
DOI: 10.1001/archpsyc.59.10.877
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mediators and Moderators of Treatment Effects in Randomized Clinical Trials

Abstract: Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) not only are the gold standard for evaluating the efficacy and effectiveness of psychiatric treatments but also can be valuable in revealing moderators and mediators of therapeutic change. Conceptually, moderators identify on whom and under what circumstances treatments have different effects. Mediators identify why and how treatments have effects. We describe an analytic framework to identify and distinguish between moderators and mediators in RCTs when outcomes are measured … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

23
2,375
2
13

Year Published

2004
2004
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,289 publications
(2,419 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
23
2,375
2
13
Order By: Relevance
“…Reduction in severity of defeatist attitudes during treatment was significantly correlated with improvement in functioning at 18-month follow up in CBSST, but not in supportive contact. This finding provides some evidence for mediation, but severity of defeatist attitudes did not change significantly in treatment (Table 3), which is required by contemporary mediation criteria (e.g., (36)). The finding of a large treatment group difference in participants with more severe defeatist attitudes (d=1.11), but only minimal treatment benefit in participants with less severe defeatist attitudes (d=0.18), also provides some support for moderation, but the three-way interaction between defeatist attitudes, treatment group and time in the mixed-model analysis was not significant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Reduction in severity of defeatist attitudes during treatment was significantly correlated with improvement in functioning at 18-month follow up in CBSST, but not in supportive contact. This finding provides some evidence for mediation, but severity of defeatist attitudes did not change significantly in treatment (Table 3), which is required by contemporary mediation criteria (e.g., (36)). The finding of a large treatment group difference in participants with more severe defeatist attitudes (d=1.11), but only minimal treatment benefit in participants with less severe defeatist attitudes (d=0.18), also provides some support for moderation, but the three-way interaction between defeatist attitudes, treatment group and time in the mixed-model analysis was not significant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…However, if all the indicators of peer relations were considered simultaneously, only increases in peer acceptance significantly mediated the impact of the GBG on externalizing behavior. As this role of positive peer relations in the reduction of externalizing problems was studied in a RCT intervention study that aimed to facilitate positive peer interactions (Hinshaw, 2002;Kraemer, Wilson, Fairburn, & Agras, 2002), these findings have several implications. First, our findings are supportive of positive peer relations as environmental mediators of children's externalizing behavior development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The search strategy, inclusion and exclusion criteria, data extraction, and data handling are described in detail elsewhere (Haasova et al 2013). The MacArthur guidelines (Kraemer et al 2002) were followed in analyses of moderators and mediators. All statistical analyses were performed using Stata v. 11.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%