1984
DOI: 10.1002/crq.39019840404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mediation paradigms and professional identities

Abstract: Can we activate a new movement for justice?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, most of the mediators in this study made intervention decisions pragmatically, applying their values to the specific issues in each case. A strong ideological commitment to client autonomy would have been shown if, for example, most mediators had accepted all of the proposed settlements (a position like that recommended by Lande, 1984).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, most of the mediators in this study made intervention decisions pragmatically, applying their values to the specific issues in each case. A strong ideological commitment to client autonomy would have been shown if, for example, most mediators had accepted all of the proposed settlements (a position like that recommended by Lande, 1984).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is unclear as to whether traditional laws protecting lawyer-client and doctor-patient communications apply in the context of mediation. Furthermore, mediators who are not members of a legally recognized profession probably cannot extend their clients any protection of their privacy (Lande 1984). Few couples are made aware of the risks they may be taking upon entering mediation in unregulated jurisdictions.…”
Section: Developing Training and Practice Standards For Custody Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The differences between the FLS/ABA standards and the AFCC model standards center on the nature and appropriateness of mediators' intervention and have prompted a lively debate. Lande (1984) views the FLS/ABA standards as intrusive and counterproductive. "Taken together, [they] present a grave threat that mediators will subtly or not-so-subtly dominate the process," Lande asserts, adding that "the mediator's mandatory repeated disclosure of any biases may pressure participants to follow the mediator's values rather than their own."…”
Section: Ethics In Mediation Training: Problems With Standardsmentioning
confidence: 99%