Mediating and Analyzing Social Data

Ding, Ying; Toma, Ioan; Kang, Sin-Jae; Zhang, Zhixiong; Fried, Michael

doi:10.1007/978-3-540-88873-4_30

Cited by 2 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 3 publications

(1 reference statement)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…On delicious a community tag identifies a resource as much as it gives access to its representation, the latter being constantly evolving over time (a collection of bookmarks and tags is bound to grow). It might be added, thus departing slightly from the interpretations given in the W3C document entitled Architecture of the World Wide Web, Volume One 21 , that while a URI identifies an information resource in a functional way, such as a periodically updated report on the weather in the State of Oaxaca, which can be represented online in such and such a way, it may also refer (irw:refersTo) to a noninformation resource that corresponds to the current (real-world) weather in this part of Mexico. Similarly, a URI like http://delicious.com/fabien_gandon/web in delicious.…”

Section: The Identity Of Tags In Deliciousmentioning

confidence: 97%

“…From this definition it appears that tagging is choosing a URI instead of a label which seems to contradict just about everything we know about tagging. Consequently we depart from [21]'s Upper Tag Ontology (UTO) since it rests on similar assumptions: "Tags are nothing more special than a typed hyperlink. We can use "rel" attribute to type hyperlinks".…”

Section: The Identity Of Tags In Nicetagmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Speech acts meet tagging

Monnin

Limpens

Gandon

et al. 2010

Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Semantic Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

International audienceCurrent tag models do not fully take into account the rich and diverse nature of tags. Each model makes different partial assumptions as to the definition and attributes a tag should receive. In this paper we propose an ontology, NiceTag, whose primitives are " tag actions " modeled with RDF named graphs. This mechanism allows us to type, describe and thus ensure the traceability of each single act of tagging. Our named graphs contain at least a resource linked to a " sign " , which can be any resource reachable on the Web (an ontology concept, an image, etc.). The resource, the sign and the link between them are the three components of the acts of tagging that we want to explicitly represent as social actions, akin to speech acts. The purpose of our model is threefold. First, to be able to describe acts of tagging in a very precise and general manner, consistent with the principles behind the architecture of the Web. To reconcile and bridge existing tag models (Newman ontology, Tagont, ES, SCOT, SIOC, CommonTag, MOAT, NAO). And finally, to propose a viable way to reify and represent the intention behind an act of tagging and leverage its semantics

show abstract

Section: The Identity Of Tags In Deliciousmentioning

confidence: 97%

Section: The Identity Of Tags In Nicetagmentioning

confidence: 99%

Speech acts meet tagging

Monnin

Limpens

Gandon

et al. 2010

Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Semantic Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…32 Ibid. 33 C'est également une conception défendue par les créateurs de l'Upper Tag Ontology, (Ding et al, 2008) : « Tags are nothing more special than a typed hyperlink. We can use « rel » attribute to type hyperlinks » En réalité, nombres de tags ne sont pris dans aucun lien hypertexte, à commencer par les machine tags de Flickr ou les hash tags de Twitter -du moins à l'origine, s'agissant de ces derniers.…”

Section: Libelléunclassified

Distinguer/Expliciter. L’ontologie du Web comme ontologie

Monnin

Livet

2014

intel

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Distinguer/Expliciter. L'ontologie du Web comme ontologie « d'opérations » Alexandre MONNIN & Pierre LIVET# RÉSUMÉ. Prenant au sérieux la « métaphysique empirique » de l'architecture du Web, nous entendons saisir les entités qu'elle distingue. Il ne s'agit donc pas de reconduire ainsi des distinctions classiques. Le travail réalisé par les architectes du Web ressortit à l'ingénierie. Pour cette raison, nous posons les linéaments d'une approche processuelle de l'ontologie, intégrant en son sein les opérations de distinction et d'explicitation qui conduisent à faire émerger des types ontologiques. Cette réflexion est rapportée à plusieurs exemples abordés au cours de la première partie, des folksonomies aux ontologies informatiques, en passant par les principes architecturaux du Web. Enfin, nous prenons en compte la pluralité des modalités d'accès afin d'étendre à l'échelle du Web tout entier la réflexion sur la dynamique ontologique au cours de laquelle surgissent de nouvelles distinctions. Un pour rendre compte de la sémantique des URI est suggéré qui s'appuie sur la sémantique bi-dimensionnelle de Robert Stalnaker, étendue à la multi-dimensionnalité et repensée dans une optique dégagée de son ancrage exclusif dans la question du vrai.

show abstract

Mediating and Analyzing Social Data

Cited by 2 publications

References 3 publications

Speech acts meet tagging

Speech acts meet tagging

Distinguer/Expliciter. L’ontologie du Web comme ontologie

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About