2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.nlm.2021.107507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Medial entorhinal cortex lesions produce delay-dependent disruptions in memory for elapsed time

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
6
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
3
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results point to a specific necessity of MEC in flexible, context-dependent timing behavior. Overall, our findings are in line with prior work demonstrating inactivation or lesions to MEC can disrupt timing behavior 18,44,45 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…These results point to a specific necessity of MEC in flexible, context-dependent timing behavior. Overall, our findings are in line with prior work demonstrating inactivation or lesions to MEC can disrupt timing behavior 18,44,45 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…We find that mice are completely unable to learn this task with MEC inactivation. This is in line with prior work demonstrating inactivation or lesions to MEC can disrupt timing behavior (Heys et al 2020; Dias, Ferreira, and Remondes 2021; Vo et al 2021). Notably, the large effect we have observed in the novel tDNMS task (Cohen’s d = 1.13 for the % change in performance from session 1-7&8 for control and MEC inactivation mice), perhaps indicates that more flexible and/or complex timing behavior relies heavily on MEC compared to simple tasks where effects are small or nonexistent (further discussion below).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…If so, as for space, we would expect MTL regions to 1) be necessary for interval timing behavior, 2) contain cells selective to time, and 3) use distinct patterns of timeselective cells to form "timelines" of unique experiences, akin to maps. Prior work suggests that MEC fits the first two criteria: MEC is both 1) necessary for interval timing behavior [17][18][19] and 2) contains time cells that fire regularly at discrete moments as rodents report temporal durations on the scale of seconds 20 . As a population, different MEC time cells fire regularly at different moments in a timed interval, like the second hand of a clock, thereby forming a sequence of neural activity, tiling the entire timing epoch.…”
Section: Main Textmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Importantly, the histological validation of surgical performance on the patient H.M.'s brain revealed a lesion of a large portion of the EC while a significant amount of residual hippocampus remained (Annese et al, 2014). Likewise, lesion or neural inactivation of the HPC and MEC in animals shows impairment of memory of “when”, representing the timing and sequence of events and also the association of temporally segregated events (Ainge et al, 2007; Dias et al, 2021; Fortin et al, 2002, 2004; Heys et al, 2020; Jacobs et al, 2013; Kitamura et al, 2014; McEchron et al, 1998; Robinson et al, 2017; Suh et al, 2011; Vo et al, 2021), and “where”, representing spatial orientation, navigation and context (Hales et al, 2014, 2018, 2021; Honey & Good, 1993; Kitamura et al, 2012; Morris et al, 1982; Nakazawa et al, 2004; Phillips & LeDoux, 1992; Steffenach et al, 2005). Correspondingly, findings of place cells (Ekstrom et al, 2003; O'Keefe & Dostrovsky, 1971) and time cells (Kraus et al, 2013; MacDonald et al, 2011; Marks et al, 2019; Pastalkova et al, 2008; Robinson et al, 2017) in the HPC as well as grid cells (Fyhn et al, 2004; Moser et al, 2008) and recently found time‐coding cells (Heys & Dombeck, 2018; Kraus et al, 2015) in the MEC imply that spatial and temporal information is processed in the MEC‐HPC circuit for memory formation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%