2011
DOI: 10.14742/ajet.942
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Media presentation mode, English listening comprehension and cognitive load in ubiquitous learning environments: Modality effect or redundancy effect?

Abstract: Although ubiquitous learning enhances students' access to learning materials, it is crucial to find out which media presentation modes produce the best results for English listening comprehension. The present study examined the effect of media presentation mode (sound and text versus sound) on English listening comprehension and cognitive load. Participants were 162 students majoring in Applied Foreign Language at a university in Taiwan. The students were randomly assigned to either single mode (sound) or doub… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
15
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(59 reference statements)
3
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sydorenko (2010) examined the effect of different input modalities on students' vocabulary gains, listening and written recognition of word forms and concluded that captioned video helped students perform better on written recognition of word forms and gains of word meanings while non-captioned video assisted students to score better on aural recognition. Chang, Lei, and Tseng (2011) confirmed that double modes, text plus sound, were more effective than single mode listening instruction. However, while textual aids resulted in enhanced listening comprehension along with reducing cognitive load, the effect lasted only temporarily.…”
Section: Bimodal or Multimodal Scaffold In Listening Comprehensionmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sydorenko (2010) examined the effect of different input modalities on students' vocabulary gains, listening and written recognition of word forms and concluded that captioned video helped students perform better on written recognition of word forms and gains of word meanings while non-captioned video assisted students to score better on aural recognition. Chang, Lei, and Tseng (2011) confirmed that double modes, text plus sound, were more effective than single mode listening instruction. However, while textual aids resulted in enhanced listening comprehension along with reducing cognitive load, the effect lasted only temporarily.…”
Section: Bimodal or Multimodal Scaffold In Listening Comprehensionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…This confirms previous findings, which suggest that full captions or scripts may not be all beneficial. For example, Chang et al (2011) argued that while textual aids stimulated better performance the effect was temporary. Once such scaffold faded out, students had difficulty adjusting to authentic listening tasks.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar results have been reported that additional text did not support listening comprehension, and sound did not support reading comprehension because of the high cognitive load of the dual mode input (Diao & Sweller, 2007). In another study, however, the presentation of text in addition to sound input showed that it enhanced English listening comprehension and lower cognitive load (C. C. Chang, et al, 2011). Similarly, learners in the Jones and Plass (2002) and studies were shown to perform better when they were given textual or pictorial, or both textual and pictorial annotations than when they were not given any visual annotation assistance.…”
Section: Benefits and Drawbacks Of Language Learning Websites For Thesupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Such issues may include character input (Nah et al, ), which may strain the eyes (Soloway et al, ). Interface learning curve, outdoor weather, changing routes, and pedestrian interruptions can all increase cognitive load (Chang, Lei, & Tseng, ). Lowering cognitive loads during the learning process is crucial for improved learning and should be taken into consideration when designing outdoor u‐learning curriculum.…”
Section: Theoretical Perspective and Relevant Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%