2011
DOI: 10.1080/10714421.2011.624011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Media Commons and the Sad Decline of Vancouver Indymedia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Weitere Autorinnen und Autoren haben den Commons-Begriff beispielsweise auf Community Medien oder das Internet angewendet (vgl. Uzelman 2011).…”
Section: Danksagungunclassified
“…Weitere Autorinnen und Autoren haben den Commons-Begriff beispielsweise auf Community Medien oder das Internet angewendet (vgl. Uzelman 2011).…”
Section: Danksagungunclassified
“…Ironically, in certain cases, this was due to structures intended to maximize inclusivity congealing as ideal models of what democratically organized media 'should' look like (Wolfson, 2012). This led to problems of informal hierarchies on both a local (Uzelman, 2011) and a global (Frenzel et al, 2010) scale, resulting in some IMCs becoming what John Downey and Natalie Fenton dub 'radical ghettos' relevant only to activists (2003: 190). To overcome these problems, several tactics are posited as valuable: reengaging with grass-roots movements and focusing on alliance building, drawing on local hackerspaces, creating more flexible membership structures and ensuring that network-wide organizational structures are not only visible but open to challenge by local collectives.…”
Section: Provisional Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radical participatory media news network Indymedia has been sidelined in recent analyses of activist media ecologies 1 due to infrastructural and ideological problems that have seen it labelled a 'failure' (Lovink and Rossiter, 2009). These internal problems have been compounded by a perceived shift to Web 2.0 platforms on the part of activists (Castells, 2012;Lievrouw, 2011;Uzelman, 2011), with the problems associated with these new platforms -in turn -leading to broader pessimism about the value of digital media for social movements (Dean, 2009(Dean, , 2010(Dean, , 2012. It is important not to neglect Indymedia entirely, however, as concerns about corporate and governmental actors exploiting Web 2.0 media for surveillance or commercial ends (Curran et al, 2012;Morozov, 2011) actually point to the ongoing need for activist media.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, critical scholarship blends with activism when it challenges dominant power structures associated with communication and communities (Fuchs, 2014;Lent & Amazeen, 2015). Recent examples of such critical communication activism in Canada include policy interventions, fostering participatory media, and alternative media production (e.g., Hackett & Anderson, 2010;Shade, 2008;Uzelman, 2011;Waugh, Baker, & Winton, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%