2013
DOI: 10.1080/1600910x.2013.863791
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Media assemblages, ethnographic vis-ability and the enactment of video in sociological research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All in all, this emphasizes the importance of considering qualitative research as a productive and constructive activity. Liegl and Schindler (2013) discuss here the idea of media assemblage through which research is made possible. In that, video cameras as well as other devices interact with researchers, research participants, locations and times to produce certain versions of reality that can only be seen as a result of those interactions rather than an evidence of reality.…”
Section: The Use Of Technology In Qualitative Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All in all, this emphasizes the importance of considering qualitative research as a productive and constructive activity. Liegl and Schindler (2013) discuss here the idea of media assemblage through which research is made possible. In that, video cameras as well as other devices interact with researchers, research participants, locations and times to produce certain versions of reality that can only be seen as a result of those interactions rather than an evidence of reality.…”
Section: The Use Of Technology In Qualitative Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While they cannot be said to preserve and represent practical work as lived reality (cf. Liegl and Schindler, 2013), they allow a second, more distanced or even distorted (through slow motion and fast forward) look at events that are all too familiar. The detailed handling and manipulation of technologies are seen anew and become observable for analysis.…”
Section: Unfolding and Connecting Materiality And Change In Organisatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The video-camera as well only produces excellent documents when we grant to the selected detail in the camera's display what we would not grant to any human participant: that it is preserving what has "actually" happened.' Moreover, EMCA and media scholars have critiqued the dominant use of (2D) video recordings because of, for instance (a) the inadequacy of video for analysing the situated accomplishment of certain phenomena/orders of everyday action, (b) the limitations of video to 'capture' reality, (c) the intrusiveness of video recording in everyday settings, (d) the screen essentialism and planocentrism of flat video and (e) the false universalism of one-dimensional audio (Liegl and Schindler, 2013;Livingstone, 1987;Lowood, 2016;Schröter, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%