“…Each form received related to a different technology; therefore, input was received for 6 of the 10 reviewed technologies: Engage (Srinivas et al, 2017), HeartMapp (Athilingam, Clochesy, et al, 2018;Athilingam et al, 2016;Di Sano et al, 2015), HOME BP (Band et al, 2017;Band et al, 2016;Bradbury et al, 2017;Bradbury et al, 2018;Morton et al, 2018), PATHway (Triantafyllidis et al, 2018;Walsh, Moran, Cornelissen, Buys, Claes, et al, 2018), SMART-PSMS (Bartlett et al, 2014;Burns et al, 2010;Mawson et al, 2016;Mawson et al, 2014;Parker, Mawson, Mountain, Nasr, Davies, et al, 2014;, and SUPPORT-HF (Chantler et al, 2016;Rahimi et al, 2015;. For the remaining technologies, the authors either declined the invitation or did not respond after several reminders: MedFit (Duff et al, 2018;Kuklyte et al, 2017;Prabhu et al, 2018), MyHeart (Villalba et al, 2009;Villalba Mora et al, 2007;Villalba Mora et al, 2008), SMASH (Chandler et al, 2019;Davidson et al, 2015;McGillicuddy, Gregoski, et al, 2013;McGillicuddy et al, 2012;Sieverdes et al, 2013), and Mock-Up by Baek et al (Baek et al, 2018).…”