2022
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.2c00145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanistic Study of the Effects of Agricultural Amendments on Photochemical Processes in Paddy Water during Rice Growth

Abstract: The photochemical properties of paddy water might be affected by the commonly used amendments in rice fields owing to the associated changes in water chemistry; however, this important aspect has rarely been explored. We examined the effects of agricultural amendments on the photochemistry of paddy water during rice growth. The amendments significantly influenced the photogenerated reactive intermediates (RIs) in paddy water, such as triplet dissolved organic matter (3DOM*), singlet oxygen, and hydroxyl radica… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…TEMP was selected as the spin-trapping agent for EPR measurement and furfuryl alcohol (FFA) was selected as the scavengers of 1 O 2 . 53 As shown in Figure S9a, the TEMPO signal (oxidation adducts of TEMP) was not significantly increased in the CFH/OTC system in oxic conditions. Furthermore, there was no insignificant difference in the transformation of OTC and As(III) after adding FFA (Figure S9b,S9c), which indicated that there might be no 1 O 2 formation in our study.…”
Section: •−mentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…TEMP was selected as the spin-trapping agent for EPR measurement and furfuryl alcohol (FFA) was selected as the scavengers of 1 O 2 . 53 As shown in Figure S9a, the TEMPO signal (oxidation adducts of TEMP) was not significantly increased in the CFH/OTC system in oxic conditions. Furthermore, there was no insignificant difference in the transformation of OTC and As(III) after adding FFA (Figure S9b,S9c), which indicated that there might be no 1 O 2 formation in our study.…”
Section: •−mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Additional experiments were conducted to explore the possible role of 1 O 2 . TEMP was selected as the spin-trapping agent for EPR measurement and furfuryl alcohol (FFA) was selected as the scavengers of 1 O 2 . As shown in Figure S9a, the TEMPO signal (oxidation adducts of TEMP) was not significantly increased in the CFH/OTC system in oxic conditions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stronger photoactivity of DOM Re could be attributed to its more content of saturated molecules (Figure D), as the saturated compounds (high H/C) were positively correlated to f TMP and Φ 1O2 as indicated by previous observations. , Interestingly, although DOM Ri presented lower Φ •OH than DOM Re , the [•OH] ss and production rate of •OH for DOM Ri was higher than that of DOM Re (Table S6 and Figure S5). More generation of •OH in DOM Ri indicated that the •OH precursor (e.g., more low-MW substances) in DOM Ri was more photosensitive. , Moreover, model DOM isolates such as Suwannee River fulvic acid (SRFA) were commonly used in the studies on the DOM photoreactivity. , f TMP , Φ 1O2 , and Φ •OH of DOM Re and DOM Ri were 1 order of magnitude lower than that of SRFA, , and this was probably because SRFA (12.06 of HIX) contained more abundant humic components as the photosensitizer than DOM Re (1.84) and DOM Ri (0.70) …”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19,51 f TMP , Φ 1O2 , and Φ •OH of DOM Re and DOM Ri were 1 order of magnitude lower than that of SRFA, 19,51 and this was probably because SRFA (12.06 of HIX) contained more abundant humic components as the photosensitizer than DOM Re (1.84) and DOM Ri (0.70). 52 3.3. Photochemical-Induced Changes in Bulk Properties and Molecular Compositions of DOM.…”
Section: Differences In Composition Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biochar (BC) is an excellent supporting material with high porous structures and surface areas, which has been frequently used as a soil amendment and loading of catalysts in recent years (Zeng et al 2022). It has been well demonstrated that biochar protects nZVI from agglomeration and rapid oxidation, and thus enhances the degradation of pollutants by PS activation with biochar supported nZVI (Shaheen et al 2022).…”
Section: Graphical Abstractmentioning
confidence: 99%