2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2016.12.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanistic approach in powder blending PAT: Bi-layer mixing and asymptotic end point prediction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Blending aims to produce a homogeneous mixture of drug and excipient particles that accurately represents the desired ratios of the components. The mixing homogeneity is commonly monitored in batch blending to detect the end point of the mixing (Berntsson et al, 2002;Crouter and Briens, 2019;Pestieau et al, 2014;Sibik et al, 2017). For continuous processes, the mixing homogeneity is assessed of a continuous stream of powder, which enables feedback process control as well as in-process control to divert material to waste.…”
Section: Blend Mixing Homogeneity and Tablet Content Uniformitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blending aims to produce a homogeneous mixture of drug and excipient particles that accurately represents the desired ratios of the components. The mixing homogeneity is commonly monitored in batch blending to detect the end point of the mixing (Berntsson et al, 2002;Crouter and Briens, 2019;Pestieau et al, 2014;Sibik et al, 2017). For continuous processes, the mixing homogeneity is assessed of a continuous stream of powder, which enables feedback process control as well as in-process control to divert material to waste.…”
Section: Blend Mixing Homogeneity and Tablet Content Uniformitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18,19 Furthermore, while it is known that calibrationbased solutions are widely used for end-point determination, the calibration-free methods have been increasingly utilized to achieve this goal, in which the moving block standard deviation (MBSD) method is able to monitor the process status and determine the end-point depending on the spectral difference. 20,21 Yet, few studies have explored the end-point determination of column chromatographic processes by attempting to apply calibration-based or calibration-free methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, a more flexible way that removes some challenges of both qualitative and quantitative methods has become increasingly attractive [27,28]. A typical version of such methods is moving window F test (MW-F test) derived from the Caterpillar algorithm, the main idea of which is to compare the current variation of the process with its recent variation [29,30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%