2008
DOI: 10.1890/08-0081.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanisms of Tolerance to Floral Larceny in Two Wildflower Species

Abstract: Tolerance of foliar damage is widely recognized as an effective defense against herbivores and pathogens. However, tolerance of the impacts of antagonists on pollination success is less well understood. Here, we extend the framework of tolerance to foliar damage to understand how plants mitigate the pollination and fitness costs of floral larceny (i.e., the consumption of floral nectar often without pollination). We focused on two mechanisms: high nectar rewards per flower to feed all floral visitors and high … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
11
0
6

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
1
11
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Increased plant growth and allocation to reproduction, both of which we see evidence for in this experiment, can serve as methods of tolerating herbivory in fertilized plots (e.g., Katjiua and Ward, 2006 ;Suwa and Maherali, 2008 ;Wise and Abrahamson, 2008 ;Kohyani et al, 2009 ;Sun et al, 2010 ). Fertilized plants produced more nectar and more fl owers, which may be a mechanism for tolerating nectar larceny and fl orivory ( Irwin et al, 2008 ;. Future research should address how well theories of resource allocation, resistance, and tolerance relevant to leaf herbivores (such as the optimal defense theory, the plant vigor hypothesis, or the resource availability hypothesis) can be applied to fl oral antagonists.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Increased plant growth and allocation to reproduction, both of which we see evidence for in this experiment, can serve as methods of tolerating herbivory in fertilized plots (e.g., Katjiua and Ward, 2006 ;Suwa and Maherali, 2008 ;Wise and Abrahamson, 2008 ;Kohyani et al, 2009 ;Sun et al, 2010 ). Fertilized plants produced more nectar and more fl owers, which may be a mechanism for tolerating nectar larceny and fl orivory ( Irwin et al, 2008 ;. Future research should address how well theories of resource allocation, resistance, and tolerance relevant to leaf herbivores (such as the optimal defense theory, the plant vigor hypothesis, or the resource availability hypothesis) can be applied to fl oral antagonists.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…El efecto negativo de los ladrones puede ser tolerable, si por ejemplo, tal como fue propuesto por Irwin et al (2008), las plantas pueden producir sufi ciente néctar para alimentar a los visitantes (polinizadores y ladrones). Éste es el caso de Bouvardia, pues plantas de ambos morfos sometidas a niveles constantes de remoción de néctar tuvieron volúme-nes similares a las plantas sin la simulación de robo.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…En estudios recientes se ha planteado la factibilidad de aplicar el concepto de tolerancia a otras interacciones antagonistas, además de la herbivoría, incluyendo el robo de néctar (Irwin et al, , 2008. El robo de néctar efectuado por numerosos organismos podría estar provocando respuestas de defensa en las plantas afectadas, las cuales disminuirían o compensarían de alguna manera el potencial costo energético que representa la producción de néctar y la subsecuente producción de semillas.…”
unclassified
See 2 more Smart Citations