Theoretical Advancement in Chromatography and Related Separation Techniques 1992
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-011-2686-1_15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanisms of the Separation and Transport of Polymer Systems in Chromatographic Media

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 110 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Those forces change the uniformity of the concentration profile of the particles over the channel cross section, thus favoring certain velocities and influencing the retention. With all the effects included, the retention curve especially for colloids is more complicated than eq 3, as was described by Tijssen . This is also apparent from experimental results of Small, and Noel interpreted by Ploehn, the latter presenting trendlines with several inflex points.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Those forces change the uniformity of the concentration profile of the particles over the channel cross section, thus favoring certain velocities and influencing the retention. With all the effects included, the retention curve especially for colloids is more complicated than eq 3, as was described by Tijssen . This is also apparent from experimental results of Small, and Noel interpreted by Ploehn, the latter presenting trendlines with several inflex points.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 71%
“…They present a corrected approximation for a cylindrical tube but no explicit result for a planar geometry. Furthermore, the above formulas do not reflect radial forces such as the hydrodynamic “tubular pinch” effect, , which occurs at higher velocities, and electrostatic and electrokinetic lift forces acting upon charged particles in mainly aqueous solutions . Those forces change the uniformity of the concentration profile of the particles over the channel cross section, thus favoring certain velocities and influencing the retention.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(5a), m is a parameter that depends on the pore shape. Hence, for spherical molecules, m is equal to 1, 2 or 3, for slit shaped pores, long cylindrical pores, and spherical or conical pores, respectively [8,14]. In SEC, a partition constant, KSEC, i, can be measured from the retention times of the three species i, perm and excl:…”
Section: Kseexcl Eq --Cp'excle---~q --0 (3) Coexcl Eqmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the number of particle−wall interactions becomes a dominant factor with decreasing channel depth and increasing particle diameter, we are intrigued to find out how this will influence the observed mean particle velocity and the extent of band broadening. Based on hydrodynamic mechanisms for the laminar flow of colloidal particles, it can be assumed that the linear velocity field will cause a rotation of the particles, thereby inducing an upward or downward lift toward one of the two surfaces. As these have a different velocity in the case of a shear-driven flow channel, a reduced or increased average velocity may be expected.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%