Mechanisms of promiscuity among drug metabolizing enzymes and drug transporters

Abstract

Detoxication, or ‘drug‐metabolizing’, enzymes and drug transporters exhibit remarkable substrate promiscuity and catalytic promiscuity. In contrast to substrate‐specific enzymes that participate in defined metabolic pathways, individual detoxication enzymes must cope with substrates of vast structural diversity, including previously unencountered environmental toxins. Presumably, evolution selects for a balance of ‘adequate’ kcat/KM values for a wide range of substrates, rather than optimizing kcat/KM for any individual substrate. However, the structural, energetic, and metabolic properties that achieve this balance, and hence optimize detoxication, are not well understood. Two features of detoxication enzymes that are frequently cited as contributions to promiscuity include the exploitation of highly reactive versatile cofactors, or cosubstrates, and a high degree of flexibility within the protein structure. This review examines these intuitive mechanisms in detail and clarifies the contributions of the classic ligand binding models ‘induced fit’ (IF) and ‘conformational selection’ (CS) to substrate promiscuity. The available literature data for drug metabolizing enzymes and transporters suggest that IF is exploited by these promiscuous detoxication enzymes, as it is with substrate‐specific enzymes, but the detoxication enzymes uniquely exploit ‘IFs’ to retain a wide range of substrates at their active sites. In contrast, whereas CS provides no catalytic advantage to substrate‐specific enzymes, promiscuous enzymes may uniquely exploit it to recruit a wide range of substrates. The combination of CS and IF, for recruitment and retention of substrates, can potentially optimize the promiscuity of drug metabolizing enzymes and drug transporters.

Enzyme promiscuity and evolution in light of cellular metabolism

“…Ita Gruic and Dan Tawfik [4] analyze these constraints by examining aminoacyl‐tRNA synthetases – an enzyme class that has systematically evolved for high selectivity. In his article, William Atkins [5] reviews the other extreme – detoxifying, drug‐metabolizing enzymes, and transporters that exhibit unusually broad substrate acceptance, as well as high substrate and catalytic promiscuity.…”

A reverse chemical ecology approach to explore wood natural durability

“…Glutathione transferases, as other drug metabolizing enzymes, possess the ability to bind structurally unrelated molecules (Atkins, 2019), suggesting that they could be good candidates to test the proposed reverse chemical approach. In particular, six GSTs belonging to the omega class from Trametes versicolor (TvGSTOs) have been shown to be able to bind wood polyphenolic compounds known to possess antimicrobial activity (Schwartz et al, 2018;Perrot et al, 2018).…”

Steroid disulfates - Sulfation double trouble

“…In their substrate-binding site, cytoplasmic sulfotransferases such as SULT2A1 show a high degree of plasticity. They accept a wide variation of substrates, due to flexible binding loops around the substrate binding pocket (Berger, Guttman, Amar et al, 2011,Atkins, 2020. At times it can be difficult to understand substrate specificity on a molecular level, even when looking at 3D structures of enzyme-substrate complexes (Hirschmann, Krause, Baruch et al, 2017).…”