2014
DOI: 10.21425/f56118999
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanisms controlling the distribution of two invasive Bromus species

Abstract: In order to predict future range shifts for invasive species it is important to explore their ability to acclimate to the new environment and understand physiological and reproductive constraints controlling their distribution. My dissertation studied mechanisms by which temperature may affect the distribution of two aggressive plant invaders in North America, Bromus tectorum and Bromus rubens. I first evaluated winter freezing tolerance of Bromus species and demonstrated that the mechanism explaining their di… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both species greatly reduce native biodiversity by increasing wildfire frequency and severity, and by outcompeting native species for soil water (Smith et al, 1997;Brooks, 2000;Salo, 2004;Bradley et al, 2006). The two Bromus species also have distinct distributions along elevational gradients (Beatley, 1966;Brown & Rowe, 2004;Bykova, 2012). The current distribution of B. tectorum in North America lies between 29°and 65°N (Valliant et al, 2007), and its northern limit in western North America coincides with the À30°C isocline for minimum winter temperature (Mack, 1981;Environment Canada, 2007;Valliant et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both species greatly reduce native biodiversity by increasing wildfire frequency and severity, and by outcompeting native species for soil water (Smith et al, 1997;Brooks, 2000;Salo, 2004;Bradley et al, 2006). The two Bromus species also have distinct distributions along elevational gradients (Beatley, 1966;Brown & Rowe, 2004;Bykova, 2012). The current distribution of B. tectorum in North America lies between 29°and 65°N (Valliant et al, 2007), and its northern limit in western North America coincides with the À30°C isocline for minimum winter temperature (Mack, 1981;Environment Canada, 2007;Valliant et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bromus tectorum is thought to be the more cold tolerant of the two species, as it occurs at higher latitude and altitude than B. rubens and has been shown in field trials to survive winter conditions that are lethal to B. rubens (Hulbert, 1955). For example, in the northern Mojave desert region near Las Vegas, Nevada, B. rubens is common at low-to-mid elevations of 700-1500 m, while B. tectorum predominates at 1500-2300 m (Bykova, 2012). Bromus rubens, by contrast, is restricted to landscapes south of 46°N in western North America (Smith et al, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%