2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-3659(01)00309-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanism of tumor-targeted delivery of macromolecular drugs, including the EPR effect in solid tumor and clinical overview of the prototype polymeric drug SMANCS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
504
0
5

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 844 publications
(517 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
5
504
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Nanocarriers entered into the tumor are not removed efficiently and are thus preserved in the tumor. This passive phenomenon has been called the "Enhanced Permeability and Retention (EPR) effect," discovered by Matsumura and Maeda (Matsumura and Maeda, 1986;Maeda et al, 2001;Maeda et al, 2009;Danhier et al, 2010). Rapid vascularization in fastgrowing cancerous tissues is known to result in leaky, defective architecture and impaired lymphatic drainage.…”
Section: Passive Targetingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nanocarriers entered into the tumor are not removed efficiently and are thus preserved in the tumor. This passive phenomenon has been called the "Enhanced Permeability and Retention (EPR) effect," discovered by Matsumura and Maeda (Matsumura and Maeda, 1986;Maeda et al, 2001;Maeda et al, 2009;Danhier et al, 2010). Rapid vascularization in fastgrowing cancerous tissues is known to result in leaky, defective architecture and impaired lymphatic drainage.…”
Section: Passive Targetingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vesicles larger than 200 nm accumulate in the spleen since their size does not allow them to pass through the walls of the venous sinuses in splenic red pulp tissue [2,17,18]. This has been clearly demonstrated with the PEG-coated [ 18 F]FDGlabeled liposomes; the vesicles smaller than 100 nm remained in the blood pool and were accumulated in the tumor tissue due to the enhanced permeability and retention effect [19,20]; conversely, liposomes larger then 200 nm accumulated in spleen and the liver [17]. It was also demonstrated that positively-charged liposomes are more likely to aggregate and become serum-bound compared with neutrally or negatively charged liposomes; and in vivo tests revealed that liver and spleen uptake was maximal in positively charged liposomes, while the neutral liposomes had minimal uptake [17].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lead compound contained anti-MsTfRmAb to achieve active extravasation by transcytosis through binding to endothelial TfR of the tumor vessels. Much less uptake into the tumor was noted in the absence of the antibody and was attributed to tumor dependent EPR effect 13 . Fluorescent versions of the nano conjugates containing Alexa Fluor 680 were synthesized for imaging studies.…”
Section: Representative Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nano drug binds to the receptor and enters the tumor by transcytosis. In addition, some degree of access to the tumor is possible through the disordered endothelial layers that participate in tumor dependent enhanced uptake and retention (EPR) 13 . Next, the nanodrug binds to HER2 expressed on the human cancer cells and internalizes into early endosomes.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%