1982
DOI: 10.1007/bf00830668
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanism of species differences in sensitivity of monkeys and dogs to the emetic action of various drugs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A likely mechanism for LMN-NKA induced emesis is activation of gastrointestinal vagal afferent pathways via NK1 receptors on enteric neurons and/or enterochromaffin cells (see Darmani et al, 2008). Since there are marked species differences in susceptibility to different emetogens, with dogs being more sensitive to certain pharmacological classes than primates (Legeza et al, 1982), the present findings may not be predictive of an emetic effect of NK2R agonists in human subjects. Indeed, LMN-NKA was administered subcutaneously to macaques twice daily for 7 days at doses 10-fold higher than those given to dogs, and emesis was almost never observed despite achieving similar plasma concentrations (10-40 ng/ml); blood pressure was not monitored in this study and hypoactivity was not noted (unpublished observations).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…A likely mechanism for LMN-NKA induced emesis is activation of gastrointestinal vagal afferent pathways via NK1 receptors on enteric neurons and/or enterochromaffin cells (see Darmani et al, 2008). Since there are marked species differences in susceptibility to different emetogens, with dogs being more sensitive to certain pharmacological classes than primates (Legeza et al, 1982), the present findings may not be predictive of an emetic effect of NK2R agonists in human subjects. Indeed, LMN-NKA was administered subcutaneously to macaques twice daily for 7 days at doses 10-fold higher than those given to dogs, and emesis was almost never observed despite achieving similar plasma concentrations (10-40 ng/ml); blood pressure was not monitored in this study and hypoactivity was not noted (unpublished observations).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%