An enigmatic feature of behavioural state control is the rich diversity of wake-promoting neural systems. This diversity has been rationalized as 'robustness via redundancy', wherein wakefulness control is not critically dependent on one type of neuron or molecule. Studies of the brain orexin/ hypocretin system challenge this view by demonstrating that wakefulness control fails upon loss of this neurotransmitter system. Since orexin neurons signal arousal need, and excite other wakepromoting neurons, their actions illuminate nonredundant principles of arousal control. Here, we suggest such principles by reviewing the orexin system from a collective viewpoint of biology, physics and engineering. Orexin peptides excite other arousal-promoting neurons (noradrenaline, histamine, serotonin, acetylcholine neurons), either by activating mixed-cation conductances or by inhibiting potassium conductances. Ohm's law predicts that these opposite conductance changes will produce opposite effects on sensitivity of neuronal excitability to current inputs, thus enabling orexin to differentially control input-output gain of its target networks. Orexin neurons also produce other transmitters, including glutamate. When orexin cells fire, glutamate-mediated downstream excitation displays temporal decay, but orexin-mediated excitation escalates, as if orexin transmission enabled arousal controllers to compute a time integral of arousal need. Since the anatomical and functional architecture of the orexin system contains negative feedback loops (e.g. orexin → histamine → noradrenaline/serotonin-orexin), such computations may stabilize wakefulness via integral feedback, a basic engineering strategy for set point control in uncertain environments. Such dynamic behavioural control requires several distinct wake-promoting modules, which perform nonredundant transformations of arousal signals and are connected in feedback loops.
KeywordsArousal; Brain state; Control theory; Hypocretin; Hypothalamus; Neurons; Orexin ✉ denis.burdakov@crick.ac.uk.
Europe PMC Funders GroupAuthor Manuscript Curr Top Behav Neurosci. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2018 January 13. However, wakefulness also needs to be controlled on a much more rapid and unpredictable timescale than that controlled by the SCN. Most of us take this rapid wakefulness adjustment for granted, assuming that we will not fall asleep in the middle of laughing or talking. This is not so for patients suffering from the sleep-wake disorder narcolepsy, which affects about 1:2000 people and where sleep and paralysis suddenly and uncontrollably intrude into normal wakefulness [2,3]. Most cases of human narcolepsy are associated with reduced levels of orexin/hypocretin peptides in the CSF and lack of central orexin/ hypocretin-producing neurons in the brain [4][5][6][7]. Loss of orexin/hypocretin peptides in humans, dogs, mice and rats impairs arousal control, resulting in abnormally frequent and rapid loss of consciousness ('sleep attacks'). It seems that without the orexin/hypocre...