2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2013.02.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanism and application of solid phase adsorption toxin tracking for monitoring microcystins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The key role played by the pore-size distribution, especially micropores of resin, for OA-group toxins was hypothesized in our previous study [22]. Utility of SPATT bags packaged by HP20 resin was also demonstrated to successfully monitor microcystins in freshwater [23]. Presently, the range of sorbents for passive sampling of micro-algal toxins was extended and assessed in laboratory and field studies [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The key role played by the pore-size distribution, especially micropores of resin, for OA-group toxins was hypothesized in our previous study [22]. Utility of SPATT bags packaged by HP20 resin was also demonstrated to successfully monitor microcystins in freshwater [23]. Presently, the range of sorbents for passive sampling of micro-algal toxins was extended and assessed in laboratory and field studies [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Maximum adsorption capacity, q m , calculated from the adsorption isotherm, gave values of 18.6 mg g –1 , 15.3 mg g –1 , and 12.3 mg g –1 for MC-LA with TpBD-(NH 2 ) 2 , MC-LR with TpBD-(CF 3 ) 2 , and MC-RR with TpBD-(NO 2 ) 2 , respectively. With this result, TpBD-(CF 3 ) 2 outperforms the most commonly used resins reported for the capture of MC-LR from water (A860, HP20, and SP700), carbon and silica composites, , graphene oxide, and MOF adsorbent materials (Table S4). Nonetheless, despite the good performance of TpBD-(CF 3 ) 2 , some reported iron-based and ordered mesoporous carbon materials showed better performance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…To that end, methods such as liquid–liquid microextraction (LLME), , solid-phase microextraction (SPME), and solid-phase extraction (SPE) ,,, have been reported. Of the aforementioned methods, SPE adsorption techniques have been widely used for the preconcentration and purification of MCs from water using several adsorbents, such as DIAION HP20, SP700, OASIS HLB resins, , immunosorbents, , molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs), , and activated carbon . Despite the diversity of the adsorbents reported, most studies focus only on the parental compound, MC-LR, leaving an important gap in the comprehensive understanding of the adsorption capacities for other highly relevant, frequent, and toxic analogues such as MC-RR, MC-YR, and MC-LA. ,, …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, particulate grab (filter) samples underrepresented the total amount of MCs in the water. Finally, the applicability of Sepabeads ® SP700 resin to adsorb MCs from Microcystis aeruginosa cultures was also examined by Zhao et al (2013) [ 108 ], in comparison with HP20 resin. When SPATT bags were deployed in seawater spiked with MCs, the adsorption equilibration times for MCs were 30 and 15 min for HP20 and SP700 resins, respectively, showing that SP700 adsorbed MCs from water a little bit faster than HP20.…”
Section: Application Of Spatt Technology For the Monitoring Of Aqumentioning
confidence: 99%